Suppr超能文献

与标准负压伤口治疗相比,灌洗式负压伤口治疗的影响:一项回顾性、历史性、队列、对照研究。

The impact of negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation compared with standard negative-pressure wound therapy: a retrospective, historical, cohort, controlled study.

机构信息

Washington, D.C.; and Dallas, Texas From the Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital; Georgetown University School of Medicine; Georgetown University Medical Center; and the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Mar;133(3):709-716. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000438060.46290.7a.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation is a novel wound therapy that combines negative pressure with instillation of a topical solution.

METHODS

This retrospective, historical, cohort-control study examined the impact of negative-pressure wound therapy with and without instillation.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-two patients (negative-pressure wound therapy, n = 74; therapy with instillation, 6-minute dwell time, n = 34; and therapy with instillation, 20-minute dwell time, n = 34) were included in the analysis. Number of operative visits was significantly lower for the 6- and 20-minute dwell time groups (2.4 ± 0.9 and 2.6 ± 0.9, respectively) compared with the no-instillation group (3.0 ± 0.9) (p ≤ 0.05). Hospital stay was significantly shorter for the 20-minute dwell time group (11.4 ± 5.1 days) compared with the no-instillation group (14.92 ± 9.23 days) (p ≤ 0.05). Time to final surgical procedure was significantly shorter for the 6- and 20-minute dwell time groups (7.8 ± 5.2 and 7.5 ± 3.1 days, respectively) compared with the no-instillation group (9.23 ± 5.2 days) (p ≤ 0.05). Percentage of wounds closed before discharge and culture improvement for Gram-positive bacteria was significantly higher for the 6-minute dwell time group (94 and 90 percent, respectively) compared with the no-instillation group (62 and 63 percent, respectively) (p ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The authors' results suggest that negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation (6- or 20-minute dwell time) is more beneficial than standard negative-pressure wound therapy for the adjunctive treatment of acutely and chronically infected wounds that require hospital admission.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

摘要

背景

负压伤口灌洗治疗是一种新型的伤口治疗方法,它将负压与局部溶液灌洗相结合。

方法

本回顾性、历史性、队列对照研究考察了负压伤口灌洗治疗(灌洗持续 6 分钟)和(灌洗持续 20 分钟)的影响。

结果

142 例患者(负压伤口治疗组 74 例,灌洗持续 6 分钟组 34 例,灌洗持续 20 分钟组 34 例)纳入分析。与无灌洗组(3.0±0.9)相比,6 分钟和 20 分钟灌洗组的手术次数明显减少(分别为 2.4±0.9 和 2.6±0.9)(p≤0.05)。与无灌洗组(14.92±9.23 天)相比,20 分钟灌洗组的住院时间明显缩短(11.4±5.1 天)(p≤0.05)。与无灌洗组(9.23±5.2 天)相比,6 分钟和 20 分钟灌洗组的最终手术时间明显缩短(分别为 7.8±5.2 和 7.5±3.1 天)(p≤0.05)。6 分钟灌洗组的创面在出院前闭合比例和革兰阳性菌培养改善率均显著高于无灌洗组(分别为 94%和 90%)(p≤0.05)。

结论

作者的结果表明,与标准负压伤口治疗相比,负压伤口灌洗治疗(灌洗持续 6 分钟或 20 分钟)更有利于辅助治疗需要住院的急性和慢性感染性伤口。

临床问题/证据水平:治疗性,III 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验