索拉非尼治疗的已确诊肝硬化和肝细胞癌患者的生存预测因素。
Predictors of survival in patients with established cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.
作者信息
Inghilesi Andrea L, Gallori Donatella, Antonuzzo Lorenzo, Forte Paolo, Tomcikova Daniela, Arena Umberto, Colagrande Stefano, Pradella Silvia, Fani Bernardo, Gianni Elena, Boni Luca, Laffi Giacomo, Di Costanzo Francesco, Marra Fabio
机构信息
Andrea L Inghilesi, Donatella Gallori, Umberto Arena, Bernardo Fani, Giacomo Laffi, Fabio Marra, Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, I-50134 Florence, Italy.
出版信息
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan 21;20(3):786-94. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i3.786.
AIM
To investigate in greater detail the efficacy and safety of sorafenib for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with established cirrhosis.
METHODS
From October 2009 to July 2012 patients with an established diagnosis of cirrhosis and HCC treated with sorafenib were consecutively enrolled. According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification, patients were in the advanced stage (BCLC-C) or in the intermediate stage (BCLC-B) but unfit or unresponsive to other therapeutic strategies. Treatment was evaluated performing a 4-phase computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan every 2-3 mo, and analyzed according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Sorafenib was administered at 800 mg/d, until radiological progression or occurrence of unacceptable adverse events (AEs). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified predictors of 16-wk clinical benefit and overall survival.
RESULTS
Forty-four patients were enrolled, 15 had intermediate HCC and 14 a Child-Pugh score of B7. AEs caused treatment interruption in 19 patients (43%), and median treatment duration was shorter in this subset (5 wk vs 19 wk, P < 0.001) and in the BCLC-C subgroup (13 wk vs 40 wk, P = 0.015). No significant differences in the reason for treatment interruption or in treatment duration were found comparing patients in Child-Pugh class A vs B or in patients older or younger than 70 years. After 16 wk of treatment, 18 patients (41%) had stable disease or partial response. Patients with viral infection or BCLC-C were at higher risk of disease progression. ECOG, extrahepatic spread, macrovascular invasion, alpha-fetoprotein or alkaline phosphatase levels at admission were independent predictors of overall survival.
CONCLUSION
In patients with cirrhosis and HCC treated with sorafenib, AEs are a common cause of early treatment withdrawal. Vascular invasion and extrahepatic spread condition early response to treatment and survival. Baseline biochemical parameters may be helpful to identify patients at higher risk of shorter overall survival.
目的
更详细地研究索拉非尼治疗已确诊肝硬化的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的疗效和安全性。
方法
连续纳入2009年10月至2012年7月期间确诊为肝硬化且接受索拉非尼治疗的HCC患者。根据巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)分类,患者处于晚期(BCLC-C)或中期(BCLC-B),但不适合或对其他治疗策略无反应。每2 - 3个月进行一次4期计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像扫描评估治疗情况,并根据实体瘤改良反应评估标准进行分析。索拉非尼的给药剂量为800 mg/d,直至出现影像学进展或发生不可接受的不良事件(AE)。单因素和多因素分析确定了16周临床获益和总生存期的预测因素。
结果
共纳入44例患者,15例为中期HCC,14例Child-Pugh评分为B7。AE导致19例患者(43%)治疗中断,该亚组的中位治疗持续时间较短(5周对19周,P < 0.001),BCLC-C亚组也是如此(13周对40周,P = 0.015)。比较Child-Pugh A级与B级患者或年龄大于或小于70岁的患者,在治疗中断原因或治疗持续时间方面未发现显著差异。治疗16周后,18例患者(41%)病情稳定或部分缓解。病毒感染或BCLC-C患者疾病进展风险较高。入院时的东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分、肝外转移、大血管侵犯、甲胎蛋白或碱性磷酸酶水平是总生存期的独立预测因素。
结论
在接受索拉非尼治疗的肝硬化和HCC患者中,AE是早期停药的常见原因。血管侵犯和肝外转移情况影响治疗早期反应和生存期。基线生化参数可能有助于识别总生存期较短风险较高的患者。
相似文献
World J Gastroenterol. 2014-1-21
World J Gastroenterol. 2014-9-21
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017-1
引用本文的文献
Int J Mol Sci. 2023-3-19
Cancers (Basel). 2021-7-28
Biomolecules. 2020-3-25
本文引用的文献
World J Gastroenterol. 2012-7-7