Doron Julie, Trouillet Raphaël, Gana Kamel, Boiché Julie, Neveu Dorine, Ninot Grégory
a Department of Sport and Physical Education Sciences, Laboratory LIRTES (EA 7313) , Paris-East Créteil University , France.
J Pers Assess. 2014;96(5):567-75. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2014.886255. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
This study aimed to determine whether the various factors of coping as measured by the Brief COPE could be integrated into a more parsimonious hierarchical structure. To identify a higher structure for the Brief COPE, several measurement models based on prior theoretical and hierarchical conceptions of coping were tested. First, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) results revealed that the Brief COPE's 14 original factors could be represented more parsimoniously with 5 higher order dimensions: problem-solving, support-seeking, avoidance, cognitive restructuring, and distraction (N = 2,187). Measurement invariance across gender was also shown. Second, results provided strong support for the cross-validation and the concurrent validity of the hierarchical structure of the Brief COPE (N = 584). Results indicated statistically significant correlations between Brief COPE factors and trait anxiety and perceived stress. Limitations and theoretical and methodological implications of these results are discussed.
本研究旨在确定通过简易应对方式问卷(Brief COPE)测量的各种应对因素是否可以整合为一个更简洁的层次结构。为了确定简易应对方式问卷的更高层次结构,测试了几种基于先前应对理论和层次概念的测量模型。首先,验证性因素分析(CFA)结果表明,简易应对方式问卷的14个原始因素可以用5个更高阶维度更简洁地表示:解决问题、寻求支持、回避、认知重构和分心(N = 2187)。还显示了性别间的测量不变性。其次,结果为简易应对方式问卷层次结构的交叉验证和同时效度提供了有力支持(N = 584)。结果表明,简易应对方式问卷各因素与特质焦虑和感知压力之间存在统计学上的显著相关性。讨论了这些结果的局限性以及理论和方法学意义。