Department of Neurology, Landseed Hospital, Tao-Yuan County, Taiwan.
BMC Neurol. 2014 Mar 1;14:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-39.
The Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP) classification is a simple stroke classification system with value in predicting clinical outcomes. We investigated whether and how the addition of OCSP classification to the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke (SITS) symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) risk score improved the predictive performance.
We constructed an extended risk score by adding an OCSP component, which assigns 3 points for total anterior circulation infarcts, 0 point for partial anterior circulation infarcts or lacunar infarcts. Patients with posterior circulation infarcts were assigned an extended risk score of zero. We analyzed prospectively collected data from 4 hospitals to compare the predictive performance between the original and the extended scores, using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and net reclassification improvement (NRI).
In a total of 548 patients, the rates of SICH were 7.3% per the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke (NINDS) definition, 5.3% per the European-Australasian Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) II, and 3.5% per the SITS-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST). Both scores effectively predicted SICH across all three definitions. The extended score had a higher AUC for SICH per NINDS (0.704 versus 0.624, P = 0.015) and per ECASS II (0.703 versus 0.612, P = 0.016) compared with the SITS SICH risk score. NRI for the extended risk score was 22.3% (P = 0.011) for SICH per NINDS, 21.2% (P = 0.018) per ECASS II, and 24.5% (P = 0.024) per SITS-MOST.
Incorporation of the OCSP classification into the SITS SICH risk score improves risk prediction for post-thrombolysis SICH.
牛津社区卒中项目(OCSP)分类是一种简单的卒中分类系统,具有预测临床结局的价值。我们研究了 OCSP 分类是否以及如何增加到 Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke(SITS)症状性颅内出血(SICH)风险评分中,以提高预测性能。
我们通过添加 OCSP 成分构建了一个扩展风险评分,该成分将完全前循环梗死分配 3 分,部分前循环梗死或腔隙性梗死分配 0 分。后循环梗死患者的扩展风险评分为 0。我们分析了 4 家医院前瞻性收集的数据,使用接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和净重新分类改善(NRI)比较原始和扩展评分之间的预测性能。
在 548 名患者中,根据国立神经病学与卒中研究院(NINDS)定义,SICH 发生率为 7.3%,根据欧洲-澳大利亚急性卒中研究(ECASS)II 为 5.3%,根据 SITS-监测研究(SITS-MOST)为 3.5%。两种评分均能有效预测所有三种定义下的 SICH。对于 NINDS(0.704 比 0.624,P=0.015)和 ECASS II(0.703 比 0.612,P=0.016)定义的 SICH,扩展评分的 AUC 更高。对于 SITS-SICH 风险评分,扩展风险评分的 NRI 为 22.3%(NINDS 定义的 SICH,P=0.011),21.2%(ECASS II 定义的 SICH,P=0.018)和 24.5%(SITS-MOST 定义的 SICH,P=0.024)。
将 OCSP 分类纳入 SITS SICH 风险评分可提高溶栓后 SICH 的风险预测。