Research Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden; School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Department of Community Health and Medicine, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Mar;104:201-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.12.028. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
The extent that risk factors, identified in Western countries, account for health inequalities in Japan remains unclear. We analysed a nationally representative sample (Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions surveyed in 2001 (n = 40,243)). The cross-sectional association between self-rated fair or poor health and household income and a theory-based occupational social class was summarised using the relative index of inequality [RII]. The percentage attenuation in RII accounted for by candidate contributory factors - material, psychosocial, social relational and behavioural - was computed. The results showed that the RII for household income based on self-rated fair or poor health was reduced after including the four candidate contributory factors in the model by 20% (95% CI 2.1, 43.6) and 44% (95% CI 18.2, 92.5) in men and women, respectively. The RII for the Japanese Socioeconomic Classification [J-SEC] was reduced, not significantly, by 22% (95% CI -6.3, 100.0) in men in the corresponding model, while J-SEC was not associated with self-rated health in women. Material factors produced the most consistent and strong attenuation in RII for both socioeconomic indicators, while the contributions attributable to behaviour alone were modest. Social relational factors consistently attenuated the RII for both socioeconomic indicators in men whereas they did not make an independent contribution in women. The influence of perceived stress was inconsistent and depended on the socioeconomic indicator used. In summary, social inequalities in self-rated fair or poor health were reduced to a degree by the factors included. The results indicate that the levelling of health across the socioeconomic hierarchy needs to consider a wide range of factors, including material and psychosocial factors, in addition to the behavioural factors upon which the current public health policies in Japan focus. The analyses in this study need to be replicated using a longitudinal study design to confirm the roles of different factors in health inequalities.
在日本,在西方国家确定的风险因素在多大程度上导致了健康不平等仍不清楚。我们分析了一个全国代表性样本(2001 年进行的综合生活状况调查(n=40243))。使用相对不平等指数(RII)总结了自评健康状况一般或较差与家庭收入之间以及基于理论的职业社会阶层之间的横断面关联。通过计算候选促成因素(物质、心理社会、社会关系和行为)所解释的 RII 衰减百分比来评估其作用。结果表明,在模型中纳入四个候选促成因素后,基于自评健康状况一般或较差的家庭收入的 RII 分别降低了 20%(95%CI2.1,43.6)和 44%(95%CI18.2,92.5),男性和女性分别降低了 20%(95%CI2.1,43.6)和 44%(95%CI18.2,92.5)。在相应的模型中,日本社会经济分类(J-SEC)的 RII 降低了 22%(95%CI-6.3,100.0),但没有显著意义,而 J-SEC 与女性的自评健康状况无关。物质因素对两个社会经济指标的 RII 产生了最一致和最强的衰减作用,而仅行为因素的贡献适度。社会关系因素在男性中一致地降低了两个社会经济指标的 RII,而在女性中则没有独立的贡献。感知压力的影响不一致,取决于所使用的社会经济指标。总之,通过纳入的因素,自评健康状况一般或较差的社会不平等程度有所降低。结果表明,要实现整个社会经济阶层健康水平的均等化,需要考虑广泛的因素,包括物质和心理社会因素,以及日本当前公共卫生政策所关注的行为因素。需要使用纵向研究设计来复制本研究中的分析,以确认不同因素在健康不平等中的作用。