De Vecchi Clément, Caudron Jérôme, Dubourg Benjamin, Pirot Nathalie, Lefebvre Valentin, Bauer Fabrice, Eltchaninoff Hélène, Dacher Jean-Nicolas
Department of Radiology, Cardiac CT/MR Unit, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France.
Department of Radiology, Cardiac CT/MR Unit, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France; Inserm U1096, Rouen, France; University of Rouen, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, Rouen, France.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014 Jan-Feb;8(1):52-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
Previous studies showed discrepancies between echocardiographic and multidector row CT (MDCT) measurements of aortic valve area (AVA).
Our aim was to evaluate the effect of the ellipsoid shape of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), as shown and measured by MDCT, on the assessment of AVA by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
This retrospective single-center study involved 49 patients with severe aortic stenosis referred before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The AVA was deduced from the continuity equation on TTE and from planimetry on cardiac MDCT. Area of the LVOT was calculated as follows: on TTE, from the measurement of LVOT diameter on parasternal long-axis view; on MDCT, from manual planimetry by using multiplanar reconstruction perpendicular to LVOT.
At baseline, correlation of TTE vs MDCT AVA measurements was moderate (R = 0.622; P < .001). TTE underestimated AVA compared with MDCT (0.66 ± 0.15 cm2 vs. 0.87 ± 0.15 cm2; P < .001). After correcting the continuity equation with the LVOT area as measured by MDCT, mean AVA drawn from TTE did not differ from MDCT (0.86 ± 0.2 cm2) and correlation between TTE and MDCT measurements increased (R = 0.704; P < .001).
Assuming that LVOT area is circular with TTE results in constant underestimation of the AVA with the continuity equation compared with MDCT planimetry. The elliptical not circular shape of LVOT largely explains these discrepancies.
既往研究显示,超声心动图与多排螺旋CT(MDCT)测量的主动脉瓣面积(AVA)存在差异。
我们的目的是评估MDCT所显示和测量的左心室流出道(LVOT)椭圆形形态对经胸超声心动图(TTE)评估重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者AVA的影响。
这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了49例在经导管主动脉瓣植入术前转诊的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者。通过TTE上的连续性方程和心脏MDCT上的面积测量法得出AVA。LVOT面积计算如下:在TTE上,通过测量胸骨旁长轴视图上的LVOT直径;在MDCT上,通过使用垂直于LVOT的多平面重建进行手动面积测量。
基线时,TTE与MDCT的AVA测量值之间的相关性为中等(R = 0.622;P <.001)。与MDCT相比,TTE低估了AVA(0.66±0.15 cm²对0.87±0.15 cm²;P <.001)。在用MDCT测量的LVOT面积校正连续性方程后,TTE得出的平均AVA与MDCT无差异(0.86±0.2 cm²),且TTE与MDCT测量值之间的相关性增加(R = 0.704;P <.001)。
假设LVOT面积在TTE上为圆形,与MDCT面积测量法相比,连续性方程会导致AVA持续被低估。LVOT的椭圆形而非圆形形态很大程度上解释了这些差异。