Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Forensic Medicine and Radiology, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, Switzerland.
Clin Radiol. 2014 May;69(5):e199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.12.011. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
To assess the value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) and an iterative frequency split-normalized metal artefact reduction (IFS-MAR) algorithm compared to filtered back projections (FBP) from single-energy CT (SECT) for artefact reduction in internally fixated humeral fractures.
Six internally fixated cadaveric humeri were examined using SECT and DECT. Data were reconstructed using FBP, IFS-MAR, and mono-energetic DECT extrapolations. Image analysis included radiodensity values and qualitative evaluation of artefacts, image quality, and level of confidence for localizing screw tips.
Radiodensity values of streak artefacts were significantly different (p < 0.05) between FBP (-104 ± 222) and IFS-MAR (73 ± 122), and between FBP and DECT (32 ± 151), without differences between IFS-MAR and DECT (p < 0.553). Compared to FBP, qualitative artefacts were significantly reduced using IFS-MAR (p < 0.001) and DECT (p < 0.05), without significant differences between IFS-MAR and DECT (p < 0.219). Image quality significantly (p = 0.016) improved for IFS-MAR and DECT compared to FBP, without significant differences between IFS-MAR and DECT (p < 0.553). The level of confidence for screw tip localization was assessed as best for DECT in all cases.
Both IFS-MAR in SECT and mono-energetic DECT produce improved image quality and a reduction of metal artefacts. Screw tip positions can be most confidently assessed using DECT.
评估双能 CT(DECT)与迭代频率分裂归一化金属伪影降低(IFS-MAR)算法与单能 CT(SECT)滤波反投影(FBP)相比,在减少内置肱骨骨折金属伪影方面的价值。
使用 SECT 和 DECT 对 6 具内置固定的肱骨尸体进行检查。数据使用 FBP、IFS-MAR 和单能 DECT 外推进行重建。图像分析包括放射性密度值和伪影的定性评估、图像质量以及定位螺钉尖端的置信度。
条纹伪影的放射性密度值在 FBP(-104 ± 222)与 IFS-MAR(73 ± 122)之间以及 FBP 与 DECT(32 ± 151)之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05),而 IFS-MAR 与 DECT 之间无差异(p < 0.553)。与 FBP 相比,IFS-MAR(p < 0.001)和 DECT(p < 0.05)可显著减少定性伪影,IFS-MAR 与 DECT 之间无显著差异(p < 0.219)。与 FBP 相比,IFS-MAR 和 DECT 的图像质量显著提高(p = 0.016),IFS-MAR 与 DECT 之间无显著差异(p < 0.553)。在所有情况下,螺钉尖端定位的置信度均被评估为 DECT 最佳。
SECT 中的 IFS-MAR 和单能 DECT 均可提高图像质量并减少金属伪影。使用 DECT 可以最有信心地评估螺钉尖端位置。