Zhang Chao, Xie Bingdi, Li Xiaowen, Yao Yuanrong
Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Anshan Avenue 154, Heping District, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Neurol Sci. 2014 Aug;35(8):1209-14. doi: 10.1007/s10072-014-1682-z. Epub 2014 Mar 2.
Few objective methods have been utilized to identify the small myelinated fiber impairment causing neuropathic pain in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). In this study, contact heat-evoked potentials (CHEPs) were applied to study the nociceptive pathway in GBS. Sixty GBS patients and fifty healthy controls were enrolled. The 60 GBS patients were divided into two subgroups presenting with or without subjective lower limb paresthesia (21/39). CHEPs were recorded at Cz and Pz with a peak thermal stimuli of 47 °C applied to the skin of the leg above the internal malleolus (AIM) and of the waist at the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) level. The N2 latency and N2-P2 amplitude of CHEPs were compared. When the skin of the leg AIM was stimulated, the N2 latency was significantly postponed (425.23 ± 28.66 vs. 402.30 ± 19.48 ms, P < 0.05) and the N2-P2 amplitude significantly decreased in GBS patients as compared to controls (32.71 ± 7.49 vs. 42.77 ± 8.71 μV, P < 0.05). Slower nerve conduction velocity was observed in GBS patients (11.84 ± 1.45 vs. 13.28 ± 0.66 ms, P < 0.05). However, no differences in N2 latency or N2-P2 amplitude were detected between the two subgroups of GBS patients with or without subjective lower limb paresthesia (P all >0.05). Moreover, there were no differences in N2 latency and N2-P2 amplitude among different groups when the waist was stimulated at the ASIS level. Our study suggested that CHEPs could be utilized as an objective and non-invasive tool to detect small myelinated fiber damage in GBS patients, especially for those without subjective paresthesia.
很少有客观方法被用于识别吉兰 - 巴雷综合征(GBS)中导致神经性疼痛的小髓鞘纤维损伤。在本研究中,接触热诱发电位(CHEPs)被用于研究GBS中的伤害感受通路。纳入了60例GBS患者和50名健康对照。60例GBS患者被分为有或无主观下肢感觉异常的两个亚组(21/39)。在Cz和Pz记录CHEPs,将47℃的峰值热刺激施加于内踝上方腿部皮肤(AIM)和髂前上棘(ASIS)水平的腰部皮肤。比较CHEPs的N2潜伏期和N2 - P2波幅。当刺激腿部AIM皮肤时,与对照组相比,GBS患者的N2潜伏期显著延长(425.23±28.66 vs. 402.30±19.48 ms,P<0.05),N2 - P2波幅显著降低(32.71±7.49 vs. 42.77±8.71 μV,P<0.05)。GBS患者观察到神经传导速度较慢(11.84±1.45 vs. 13.28±0.66 ms,P<0.05)。然而,有或无主观下肢感觉异常的GBS患者两个亚组之间在N2潜伏期或N2 - P2波幅上未检测到差异(所有P>0.05)。此外,当在ASIS水平刺激腰部时,不同组之间在N2潜伏期和N2 - P2波幅上没有差异。我们的研究表明,CHEPs可作为一种客观且非侵入性的工具来检测GBS患者的小髓鞘纤维损伤,尤其是对于那些没有主观感觉异常的患者。