Rafnsson Arnar, Shemyakin Alexey, Pernow John
Karolinska Institute Department of Medicine, Unit of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institute Department of Medicine, Unit of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
Life Sci. 2014 Nov 24;118(2):435-9. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2014.02.026. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
Endothelin-1 contributes to endothelial dysfunction in patients with atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes. In healthy arteries the ETA receptor mediates the main part of the vasoconstriction induced by endothelin-1 whilst the ETB receptor mediates vasodilatation. The ETB receptor expression is upregulated on vascular smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis and may contribute to the increased vasoconstrictor tone and endothelial dysfunction observed in this condition. Due to these opposing effects of the ETB receptor it remains unclear whether ETB blockade together with ETA blockade may be detrimental or beneficial. The aim was therefore to compare the effects of selective ETA and dual ETA/ETB blockade on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease.
Forearm endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilatation was assessed by venous occlusion plethysmography in 12 patients before and after selective ETA or dual ETA/ETB receptor blockade.
Dual ETA/ETB receptor blockade increased baseline forearm blood flow by 30±14% (P<0.01) whereas selective ETA blockade did not (14±8%). Both selective ETA blockade and dual ETA/ETB blockade significantly improved endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. The improvement did not differ between the two treatments. There was also an increase in endothelium-independent vasodilatation with both treatments. Dual ETA/ETB blockade did not significantly increase microvascular flow but improved transcutaneous pO2.
Both selective ETA and dual ETA/ETB improve endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. ETB blockade increases basal blood flow but does not additionally improve endothelium-dependent vasodilatation.
内皮素-1在动脉粥样硬化和2型糖尿病患者的内皮功能障碍中起作用。在健康动脉中,内皮素A(ETA)受体介导内皮素-1诱导的主要血管收缩作用,而内皮素B(ETB)受体介导血管舒张。在动脉粥样硬化中,血管平滑肌细胞上的ETB受体表达上调,这可能导致这种情况下血管收缩张力增加和内皮功能障碍。由于ETB受体的这些相反作用,目前尚不清楚ETB阻断与ETA阻断联合使用是有害还是有益。因此,本研究旨在比较选择性ETA阻断和双重ETA/ETB阻断对2型糖尿病和冠状动脉疾病患者内皮功能的影响。
通过静脉阻塞体积描记法评估12例患者在选择性ETA或双重ETA/ETB受体阻断前后的前臂内皮依赖性和非内皮依赖性血管舒张功能。
双重ETA/ETB受体阻断使前臂基线血流量增加30±14%(P<0.01),而选择性ETA阻断则未增加(14±8%)。选择性ETA阻断和双重ETA/ETB阻断均显著改善内皮依赖性血管舒张。两种治疗方法的改善效果无差异。两种治疗方法还均增加了非内皮依赖性血管舒张。双重ETA/ETB阻断未显著增加微血管血流量,但改善了经皮氧分压。
选择性ETA阻断和双重ETA/ETB阻断均可改善2型糖尿病和冠状动脉疾病患者的内皮依赖性血管舒张。ETB阻断增加基础血流量,但并未额外改善内皮依赖性血管舒张。