Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Int Endod J. 2015 Jan;48(1):60-7. doi: 10.1111/iej.12275. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
To verify whether the filler load of luting agents influences the radiopacity of intraradicularly placed posts.
Digital radiographs of the following posts were taken: RelyX Fiber Post (3M ESPE), GC Fiber Post (GC Corporation), DT Light Post Illusion (RTD), DT Light SL Post (RTD), Endo-Composipost (RTD), FibreKleer Parallel Post (Jeneric Pentron Incorporated), FRC Postec (Ivoclar Vivadent), Parapost Taper Lux (Còltene/Whaledent AG), Radix Fiber Post (Dentsply Maillefer), EverStick Post (Stick Tech Ltd), Dentin Post X (Komet), Tech 21 X-op (Isasan), ENA Post (Micerium). Post radiopacity was measured in millimetres of aluminium (mmAl) with reference to an aluminium step wedge. Two extracted contralateral premolars were root filled. After post space preparation, taking the midpoint of the post hole as a reference, each tooth was cut longitudinally into two halves in a mesiodistal direction. On each half, the exposed root dentine was ground flat to the deepest point of the post space, and an even layer of cement was placed and light-cured. To obtain a clinically relevant layer of cement, the material thickness was reduced to 75 μm by grinding with wet abrasive paper. A cement formulation with 30 wt% of filler was tested in one premolar, whilst a formulation with 70 wt% of filler was utilized in the contralateral tooth. Posts were then placed between the two facing root halves of each premolar, and radiopacity was measured in mmAl. Data were analysed using t-test for paired samples (P < 0.05).
Radiopacity of posts ranged between 1.44 (ENA Post) and 5.78 mmAl (FibreKleer). In the presence of the more heavily filled cement, significantly higher values of post radiopacity were measured (P < 0.001).
The radiopacity of the luting agent contributed to the overall post radiovisibility within the root. Even when the cement with lower filler content was used in combination with the least radiodense dowels, the post was detectable within the root.
验证黏固剂的填料负载是否会影响根管内放置的桩的射线不透性。
对以下桩进行数字射线照相:RelyX 纤维桩(3M ESPE)、GC 纤维桩(GC 公司)、DT Light Post Illusion(RTD)、DT Light SL Post(RTD)、Endo-Composipost(RTD)、FibreKleer Parallel Post(Jeneric Pentron Incorporated)、FRC Postec(Ivoclar Vivadent)、Parapost Taper Lux(Còltene/Whaledent AG)、Radix Fiber Post(Dentsply Maillefer)、EverStick Post(Stick Tech Ltd)、Dentin Post X(Komet)、Tech 21 X-op(Isasan)、ENA Post(Micerium)。用铝阶标测量桩的射线不透性,以毫米铝(mmAl)为单位。从每颗牙的近远中向中间点方向,将 2 颗对侧同名前磨牙沿牙体长轴纵向劈开为 2 半。在每个半牙上,暴露的根面牙本质被磨至桩腔最深处,然后均匀地涂抹一层黏固剂并用光固化。为了获得临床相关的黏固剂层,用湿砂纸将材料厚度减少至 75μm。一颗前磨牙中测试了一种填料含量为 30wt%的黏固剂配方,而对侧牙中则使用了一种填料含量为 70wt%的黏固剂配方。然后将桩放在每颗前磨牙的两半根面之间,用 mmAl 测量其射线不透性。使用配对样本 t 检验(P<0.05)对数据进行分析。
桩的射线不透性范围在 1.44(ENA 桩)和 5.78mmAl(FibreKleer)之间。在使用填料含量较高的黏固剂时,测量到的桩射线不透性显著更高(P<0.001)。
黏固剂的射线不透性有助于根内整体桩的射线可视性。即使使用填料含量较低的黏固剂与最不透射线的桩结合使用,桩仍能在根内被检测到。