Suppr超能文献

移植前HeartMate II左心室辅助装置植入与心脏移植死亡率的关联。

The association of pretransplant HeartMate II left ventricular assist device placement and heart transplantation mortality.

作者信息

Donneyong Macarius, Cheng Allen, Trivedi Jaimin R, Schumer Erin, McCants Kelly C, Birks Emma J, Slaughter Mark S

机构信息

From the *Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Louisville Medical Center, Louisville, New York; and †Division of Cardiology, University of Louisville Medical Center, Louisville, New York.

出版信息

ASAIO J. 2014 May-Jun;60(3):294-9. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000065.

Abstract

Previous United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) analysis has shown an increase in posttransplant mortality with pretransplant pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Recent studies evaluating continuous-flow LVAD demonstrated improved durability, excellent survival, and improved quality of life. This study investigates the association of preheart transplant continuous-flow LVAD placement and posttransplant mortality using the UNOS database. Heart transplant patients listed after April 2004 (N = 48,090) during the era of HeartMate (HM) II LVAD usage were investigated. Patients with UNOS 1A and 1B status with (n = 1,435) and without HMII (n = 16,379) placement before the heart transplantation were evaluated. Preliminary descriptive statistics suggested an extensive heterogeneity in patient characteristics between HMII LVAD recipients and nonrecipients. Propensity scores (1:2) were used to match HMII LVAD recipients and nonrecipients characteristics and donor characteristics. This resulted in a final sample of 2,265 patients (758 with HMII pretransplant placement and 1,507 without HMII pretransplant placement). The Kaplan-Meier curves were evaluated for the differences in postheart transplant mortality in patients with and without HMII pretransplant placement. A time-dependent Cox regression model was used to study the hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between HMII pretransplant placement and posttransplant survival. The mean age of the study group was 51.9 years old (standard deviation: 12.3). HeartMate II pretransplant placement was associated with no statistically significant difference in the risk of 30 days (HR = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-1.95, p = 0.36) and 1 year posttransplant mortality (HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 0.85-2.01, p = 0.22) compared with non-HMII recipients. The use of HMII LVAD before heart transplantation, however, was associated with a statistically significant 64% lower risk (HR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.16-0.77, p = 0.01) of mortality among heart transplant patients who survived beyond the first year of transplantation. Continuous-flow LVAD pretransplant placement is associated with improved long-term (>1 year) survival after heart transplantation.

摘要

器官共享联合网络(UNOS)之前的分析表明,移植前使用搏动血流左心室辅助装置(LVAD)会增加移植后死亡率。最近评估连续血流LVAD的研究显示其耐用性提高、生存率优异且生活质量改善。本研究使用UNOS数据库调查心脏移植前连续血流LVAD植入与移植后死亡率之间的关联。对在HeartMate(HM)II LVAD使用时代(2004年4月之后)登记的心脏移植患者(N = 48,090)进行了调查。对心脏移植前有(n = 1,435)和没有(n = 16,379)植入HMII的UNOS 1A和1B状态患者进行了评估。初步描述性统计表明,HMII LVAD接受者和非接受者之间的患者特征存在广泛异质性。倾向评分(1:2)用于匹配HMII LVAD接受者和非接受者的特征以及供体特征。这产生了一个最终样本,共2,265名患者(758名移植前植入HMII,1,507名移植前未植入HMII)。评估了移植前植入和未植入HMII的患者在心脏移植后死亡率的差异的Kaplan-Meier曲线。使用时间依赖性Cox回归模型研究移植前植入HMII与移植后生存之间关联的风险比(HR)。研究组的平均年龄为51.9岁(标准差:12.3)。与未接受HMII的患者相比,移植前植入HeartMate II与移植后30天(HR = 1.23,95%置信区间[CI]:0.79 - 1.95,p = 0.36)和1年死亡率(HR = 1.31,95% CI:0.85 - 2.01,p = 0.22)的风险无统计学显著差异。然而,在移植后第一年存活的心脏移植患者中,心脏移植前使用HMII LVAD与死亡率风险显著降低64%相关(HR = 0.36,95% CI:0.16 - 0.77,p = 0.01)。移植前植入连续血流LVAD与心脏移植后长期(>1年)生存率提高相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验