Suppr超能文献

单通道或多通道阴道穹窿高剂量率近距离放疗:每次分割前是否需要重新计划?

Single or multi-channel vaginal cuff high-dose-rate brachytherapy: Is replanning necessary prior to each fraction?

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jan-Feb;4(1):20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Feb 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Adjuvant high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy (VB) is commonly used in endometrial cancer. We evaluated the dosimetric and cost differences of using either a single plan or replan prior to each fraction for single- and multi-channel VB.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We evaluated 84 fractions from 25 patients at our institution (16 single-channel patients each 3 fractions; 9 multi-channel patients each 4 fractions). All fractions were preceded by a computed tomographic (CT) simulation scan, after which a unique treatment plan was generated, dose points per International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) 38. We calculated the dose to critical organs based on a decay-and-treat method utilizing the original catheter dwell-times for the initial fraction, and also the interfractional motion of the critical organ points between the initial and the subsequent CT scans.

RESULTS

The absolute mean dose difference was 14 cGy for bladder and 15 cGy for rectum between the replan and decay methods for single-channel, and 14 cGy for both organ points for the multi-channel cylinder. The bladder and rectum doses were not found to be significantly different between the replan and decay methods for either single-channel (bladder, P = .08; rectum, P = .19) or multi-channel cylinders (bladder, P = .85; rectum, P = .10). The mean interfractional displacement of the organ points between the initial and subsequent CT scans was 1.10 cm for the bladder and 0.67 cm for the rectum for single-channel, and 0.87 cm and 0.51 cm for multi-channel cylinders. The maximum interfractional motion was seen in the transverse plane for both organ points for both types of cylinders. At our institution, the decay method was 19% and 22% more cost-effective for single-channel and multi-channel cylinders, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show no dosimetric advantage, but higher costs, associated with replanning prior to each fraction for both single- and multi-channel VB. Fractional replanning should not be utilized on a routine basis.

摘要

目的

辅助高剂量率阴道近距离放疗(VB)常用于子宫内膜癌。我们评估了在单次和多通道 VB 中,每个分次前使用单个计划或重新计划的剂量学和成本差异。

方法和材料

我们评估了来自我们机构的 25 名患者的 84 个分次(16 名单通道患者,每个患者 3 个分次;9 名多通道患者,每个患者 4 个分次)。所有分次均在前一次 CT 模拟扫描后进行,之后生成一个独特的治疗计划,根据国际辐射单位和测量委员会(ICRU)38 计算每个剂量点。我们根据利用初始分次的原始导管驻留时间的衰减-治疗方法计算关键器官的剂量,同时还计算了初始 CT 扫描和后续 CT 扫描之间关键器官点的分次间运动。

结果

对于单通道,重新计划和衰减方法之间的膀胱绝对平均剂量差异为 14 cGy,直肠为 15 cGy;对于多通道圆柱,两个器官点的剂量差异均无统计学意义。对于单通道(膀胱,P=0.08;直肠,P=0.19)或多通道圆柱(膀胱,P=0.85;直肠,P=0.10),重新计划和衰减方法之间的膀胱和直肠剂量均无显著差异。初始和后续 CT 扫描之间器官点的分次间位移,对于单通道,膀胱为 1.10 cm,直肠为 0.67 cm;对于多通道圆柱,膀胱为 0.87 cm,直肠为 0.51 cm。对于两种类型的圆柱,器官点的最大分次间运动均发生在横断平面。在我们机构,对于单通道和多通道圆柱,衰减方法分别节省 19%和 22%的成本。

结论

我们的数据表明,对于单通道和多通道 VB,每个分次前重新计划没有剂量学优势,但成本更高。分次重新计划不应该常规使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验