Weintraub Marc J, Youngstrom Eric A, Marvin Sarah E, Podell Jennifer L, Walshaw Patricia D, Kim Eunice Y, Suddath Robert L, Forgey-Borlick Marcy J, Matkevich Brittany N, Miklowitz David J
University of Miami and University of California, Los Angeles; YOUNGSTROM: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; MARVIN, PODELL, WALSHAW, KIM, SUDDATH, FORGEY-BORLICK, MATKEVICH, and MIKLOWITZ: University of California, Los Angeles.
J Psychiatr Pract. 2014 Mar;20(2):154-62. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000445251.20875.47.
This study examined the diagnostic profiles and clinical characteristics of youth (ages 6-18 years) referred for diagnostic evaluation to a pediatric mood disorders clinic that specializes in early-onset bipolar disorder.
A total of 250 youth were prescreened in an initial telephone intake, and 73 participated in a full diagnostic evaluation. Trained psychologists administered the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADSPL) to the child and to at least one parent, and a child psychiatrist conducted a separate pharmacological evaluation. Evaluators then met with a larger clinical team for a consensus diagnosticconference.
Based on consensus diagnoses, 13 of the 73 referred youth (18%) met lifetime DSM-IV-TR criteria for a bipolar spectrum disorder (BSD; bipolar I, II or not otherwise specified disorder, or cyclothymic disorder). Of these 73, 27 (37%) were referred with a community diagnosis of a bipolar spectrum disorder, but only 7 of these 27 (26%) met DSM-IV-TR criteria for a bipolar spectrum diagnosis based on a structured interview and consensus diagnoses. The most common Axis I diagnoses (based on structured interview/consensus) were attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder (31/73, 42.5%) and major depressive disorder (23/73, 32%).
When youth referred for evaluation of BSD are diagnosed using standardized interviews with multiple reporters and consensus conferences, the "true positive" rate for bipolar spectrum diagnoses is relatively low. Reasons for the discrepancy between community and research-based diagnoses of pediatric BSD- including the tendency to stretch the BSD criteria to include children with depressive episodes and only 1-2 manic symptoms-are discussed.
本研究调查了被转介至一家专门诊治早发性双相情感障碍的儿科情绪障碍诊所进行诊断评估的6至18岁青少年的诊断概况和临床特征。
共有250名青少年在最初的电话问诊中接受了预筛查,73人参与了全面的诊断评估。训练有素的心理学家对儿童及其至少一位家长实施了《学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症问卷(目前和终生版)》(K-SADSPL),一名儿童精神科医生进行了单独的药物评估。评估人员随后与一个更大的临床团队会面,召开共识诊断会议。
根据共识诊断,73名被转介的青少年中有13名(18%)符合双相谱系障碍(BSD;双相I型、II型或未另行规定的障碍,或环性心境障碍)的终生DSM-IV-TR标准。在这73人中,27人(37%)被社区诊断为双相谱系障碍,但在这27人中,只有7人(26%)基于结构化访谈和共识诊断符合双相谱系诊断的DSM-IV-TR标准。最常见的轴I诊断(基于结构化访谈/共识)是注意力缺陷/多动障碍(31/73,42.5%)和重度抑郁症(23/73,32%)。
当使用对多名报告者进行标准化访谈和共识会议的方式对被转介进行BSD评估的青少年进行诊断时,双相谱系诊断的“真阳性”率相对较低。讨论了儿科BSD社区诊断与基于研究的诊断之间存在差异的原因,包括将BSD标准扩展至包括有抑郁发作且仅有1至2种躁狂症状的儿童的倾向。