Suppr超能文献

[锁定加压钢板固定与带锁髓内钉固定治疗肱骨B型和C型骨干骨折的疗效比较]

[Effectiveness comparison between locking compression plate fixation and locked intramedullary nail fixation for humeral shaft fracture of types B and C].

作者信息

Yin Peng, Mao Zhi, Zhang Lihai, Tao Sheng, Zhang Qun, Liang Xiangdang, Zhang Hao, Long Anhua, Wang Guoqi, Tang Peifu

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Dec;27(12):1457-61.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness between locking compression plate (LCP) and locked intramedullary nail (IMN) for humeral shaft fractures of types B and C.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and January 2012, 46 patients with humeral shaft fractures of types B and C were treated, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. LCP was used for internal fixation in 22 cases (LCP group), and IMN in 24 cases (IMN group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury causes, the side of fracture, the site of fracture, the type of fracture, associated injury, and time from injury to operation between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The regular clinical examination and evaluation of radiography were done. Shoulder function was evaluated by Neer grading system and elbow function was evaluated by Mayo elbow performance score after operation.

RESULTS

The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in IMN group were significantly lower than those in LCP group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in hospitalization time between 2 groups (t=0.344, P=0.733). All patients were followed up 16.8 months on average (range, 12-24 months). At 6 months after operation, bone nonunion occurred in 1 patient of LCP group and in 2 patients of IMN group; the bone healing rate was 95.5% (21/22) in LCP group and 91.7% (22/24) in IMN group, showing no significant difference (chi2=0.000, P=1.000). Except for nonunion patients, the bone healing time was (11.77 +/- 0.75) weeks in LCP group and (11.38 +/- 0.82) weeks in IMN group, showing no significant difference (t=1.705, P=0.095). Between LCP and IMN groups, significant differences were found in radial nerve injury (4 cases vs. 0 case) and impingement of shoulder (0 case vs. 6 cases) (P < 0.05), but no significant difference in superficial infection (1 case vs. 0 case) and iatrogenic fracture (1 case vs. 2 cases) (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in shoulder function and elbow

CONCLUSION

LCP fixation and IMN fixation for humeral shaft function at 1 year after operation between 2 groups (P > 0.05). fractures of types B and C can achieved satisfactory results. More attention should be paid to avoiding radial nerve injury by fixation of LCP; nail tail should be buried deeply into the cortex of the greater tuberosity and rotator cuff should be protected to decrease the rate of impingement of shoulder by fixation of IMN.

摘要

目的

比较锁定加压钢板(LCP)与带锁髓内钉(IMN)治疗B型和C型肱骨干骨折的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2012年1月间收治的46例B型和C型肱骨干骨折患者的临床资料。22例采用LCP内固定(LCP组),24例采用IMN内固定(IMN组)。两组患者在性别、年龄、受伤原因、骨折侧别、骨折部位、骨折类型、合并伤及受伤至手术时间等方面比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后进行常规临床检查及影像学评估。采用Neer评分系统评估肩关节功能,Mayo肘关节功能评分评估肘关节功能。

结果

IMN组手术时间及术中出血量均显著低于LCP组(P<0.05)。两组患者住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.344,P=0.733)。所有患者均获随访,平均随访16.8个月(12~24个月)。术后6个月,LCP组有1例、IMN组有2例发生骨不连;LCP组骨愈合率为95.5%(21/22),IMN组为91.7%(22/24),差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.000,P=1.000)。除骨不连患者外,LCP组骨愈合时间为(11.77±0.75)周,IMN组为(11.38±0.82)周,差异无统计学意义(t=1.705,P=0.095)。LCP组与IMN组在桡神经损伤(4例 vs. 0例)和肩关节撞击(0例 vs. 6例)方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但在浅表感染(1例 vs. 0例)和医源性骨折(1例 vs. 2例)方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后1年肩关节和肘关节功能比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

LCP和IMN固定治疗B型和C型肱骨干骨折均可取得满意疗效。采用LCP固定时应更加注意避免桡神经损伤;采用IMN固定时应将钉尾深埋于大结节皮质内并保护肩袖,以降低肩关节撞击发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验