Cassagne Myriam, Laurent Camille, Rodrigues Magda, Galinier Anne, Spoerl Eberhard, Galiacy Stéphane D, Soler Vincent, Fournié Pierre, Malecaze François
Department of Ophthalmology Purpan Hospital, Toulouse, France 2Laboratory of Pathology, Purpan Hospital, Toulouse, France 3Department of Biochemistry, Rangueil Hospital, Toulouse, France 4Department of Ophthalmology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresde.
Laboratory of Pathology, Purpan Hospital, Toulouse, France 3Department of Biochemistry, Rangueil Hospital, Toulouse, France 4Department of Ophthalmology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany 5INSERM U1043, Center of Physiopathology, Dynamique.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Feb;57(2):594-603. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12595.
We compared an iontophoresis riboflavin delivery technique for transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking (I-CXL) with a conventional CXL (C-CXL).
We designed three experimental sets using 152 New Zealand rabbits to study riboflavin application by iontophoresis using charged riboflavin solution (Ricrolin+) with a 1-mA current for 5 minutes. The first set was to compare riboflavin concentration measured by HPLC in corneas after iontophoresis or conventional riboflavin application. The second set was to analyze autofluorescence and stromal collagen modification immediately and 14 days after I-CXL or C-CXL, by using nonlinear two-photon microscopy (TP) and second harmonic generation (SHG). In the third set, physical modifications after I-CXL and C-CXL were evaluated by stress-strain measurements and by studying corneal resistance against collagenase digestion.
Based on HPLC analysis, we found that iontophoresis allowed riboflavin diffusion with 2-fold less riboflavin concentration than conventional application (936.2 ± 312.5 and 1708 ± 908.3 ng/mL, respectively, P < 0.05). Corneal TP and SHG imaging revealed that I-CXL and C-CXL resulted in a comparable increased anterior and median stromal autofluorescence and collagen packing. The stress at 10% strain showed a similar stiffness of corneas treated by I-CXL or C-CXL (631.9 ± 241.5 and 680.3 ± 216.4 kPa, respectively, P = 0.908). Moreover, we observed an increased resistance against corneal collagenase digestion after I-CXL and C-CXL (61.90% ± 5.28% and 72.21% ± 4.32% of remaining surface, respectively, P = 0.154).
This experimental study suggests that I-CXL is a promising alternative methodology for riboflavin delivery in crosslinking treatments, preserving the epithelium.
我们比较了用于经上皮角膜胶原交联(I-CXL)的离子电渗法核黄素递送技术与传统交联(C-CXL)。
我们使用152只新西兰兔设计了三组实验,以研究使用带电荷的核黄素溶液(Ricrolin+)、1毫安电流持续5分钟通过离子电渗法应用核黄素的情况。第一组是比较离子电渗法或传统核黄素应用后通过高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测量的角膜中核黄素浓度。第二组是通过使用非线性双光子显微镜(TP)和二次谐波产生(SHG),在I-CXL或C-CXL后立即以及14天后分析自发荧光和基质胶原修饰。在第三组中,通过应力-应变测量以及研究角膜对胶原酶消化的抵抗力来评估I-CXL和C-CXL后的物理修饰。
基于HPLC分析,我们发现离子电渗法使核黄素扩散,其浓度比传统应用少两倍(分别为936.2±312.5和1708±908.3纳克/毫升,P<0.05)。角膜TP和SHG成像显示,I-CXL和C-CXL导致前基质和中基质自发荧光以及胶原堆积有类似增加。10%应变时的应力显示,I-CXL或C-CXL处理的角膜具有相似的硬度(分别为631.9±241.5和680.3±216.4千帕,P = 0.908)。此外,我们观察到I-CXL和C-CXL后角膜对胶原酶消化的抵抗力增加(分别为剩余表面的61.90%±5.28%和72.21%±4.32%,P = 0.154)。
这项实验研究表明,I-CXL是交联治疗中核黄素递送的一种有前景的替代方法,可保留上皮。