Suppr超能文献

经黏膜芬太尼产品用于治疗癌症爆发性疼痛的实用性如何?使用安慰剂制剂的新方法来调查用户意见。

How practical are transmucosal fentanyl products for breakthrough cancer pain? Novel use of placebo formulations to survey user opinion.

作者信息

England Ruth, Maddocks Matthew, Manderson Cathann, Zadora-Chrzastowska Sonja, Wilcock Andrew

机构信息

Hayward House Macmillan Specialist Palliative Care Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2011 Dec;1(3):349-51. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000037. Epub 2011 Sep 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Three transmucosal fentanyl products have recently been licensed for cancer-related breakthrough pain: a sublingual tablet, a buccal/sublingual tablet and a nasal spray. Limited comparative data hinder identifying the most appropriate to use and adopt onto a service formulary. However, the availability of placebo formulations provides a unique opportunity to compare the practical aspects of their use.

METHODS

30 patients with cancer accessed and administered a placebo of each product and were asked to rate them using 1-7 Likert agree-disagree scales and free-text responses, with regard to ease of access and administration, palatability and overall impression. Participants rated their usual rescue analgesic similarly, based on recall. They also indicated whether they would be prepared to use the fentanyl product, and their most preferred.

RESULTS

For accessibility, the usual rescue analgesic was rated best (median score 3), significantly better than the buccal/sublingual tablet (p=0.01) and nasal spray (p<0.01), but not the sublingual tablet. Conversely, the nasal spray was rated significantly worse (median score 7) than the others (p<0.01). For ease of administration, the usual rescue analgesic and sublingual tablet were rated equally best (median score 1), with only the latter being significantly different to the buccal/sublingual tablet (p=0.04) and nasal spray (p=0.05). For palatability, the sublingual tablet was rated the best (median score 2), but was significantly different only to the buccal/sublingual tablet (p<0.01). For overall impression, the sublingual tablet was rated significantly better (median score 3) than the others, with more patients prepared to use it and selecting it as their most preferred (27 and 18, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This survey provides valuable insight into the practical aspects of these three transmucosal fentanyl products for practitioners considering their use.

摘要

背景

最近三种经黏膜芬太尼产品已获许可用于治疗癌症相关的突破性疼痛,分别是舌下片、颊下/舌下片和鼻喷雾剂。有限的比较数据阻碍了确定最适合使用并纳入服务处方集的产品。然而,安慰剂制剂的可用性提供了一个比较其使用实际情况的独特机会。

方法

30名癌症患者获取并使用了每种产品的安慰剂,并被要求使用1-7李克特同意-不同意量表和自由文本回复对其在获取和使用便利性、口感和总体印象方面进行评分。参与者根据回忆对他们常用的急救镇痛药进行了类似评分。他们还表示是否愿意使用芬太尼产品以及他们最喜欢的产品。

结果

在获取便利性方面,常用急救镇痛药评分最高(中位数为3),显著优于颊下/舌下片(p=0.01)和鼻喷雾剂(p<0.01),但不优于舌下片。相反,鼻喷雾剂的评分显著低于其他产品(中位数为7,p<0.01)。在使用便利性方面,常用急救镇痛药和舌下片评分并列最佳(中位数为1),只有舌下片与颊下/舌下片(p=0.04)和鼻喷雾剂(p=0.05)有显著差异。在口感方面,舌下片评分最佳(中位数为2),但仅与颊下/舌下片有显著差异(p<0.01)。在总体印象方面,舌下片的评分显著高于其他产品(中位数为3),更多患者愿意使用它并将其选为最喜欢的产品(分别为27人和18人)。

结论

这项调查为考虑使用这三种经黏膜芬太尼产品的从业者提供了有关其实际情况的宝贵见解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验