Suppr超能文献

元音类别结构的稀疏性:来自英语方言比较的证据。

Sparseness of vowel category structure: Evidence from English dialect comparison.

作者信息

Scharinger Mathias, Idsardi William J

机构信息

Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany ; Department of Linguistics, University of Maryland, USA.

Department of Linguistics, University of Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Lingua. 2014 Feb 1;140:35-51. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.11.007.

Abstract

Current models of speech perception tend to emphasize either fine-grained acoustic properties or coarse-grained abstract characteristics of speech sounds. We argue for a particular kind of 'sparse' vowel representations and provide new evidence that these representations account for the successful access of the corresponding categories. In an auditory semantic priming experiment, American English listeners made lexical decisions on targets (e.g. ) preceded by semantically related primes (e.g. ). Changes of the prime vowel that crossed a vowel-category boundary (e.g. ) were not treated as a tolerable variation, as assessed by a lack of priming, although the phonetic categories of the two different vowels considerably overlap in American English. Compared to the outcome of the same experiment with New Zealand English listeners, where such prime variations tolerated, our experiment supports the view that phonological representations are important in guiding the mapping process from the acoustic signal to an abstract mental representation. Our findings are discussed with regard to current models of speech perception and recent findings from brain imaging research.

摘要

当前的言语感知模型往往要么强调语音的细粒度声学特性,要么强调语音的粗粒度抽象特征。我们主张一种特定类型的“稀疏”元音表征,并提供新的证据表明这些表征能够解释相应类别的成功识别。在一项听觉语义启动实验中,美国英语听众对在语义相关启动词(例如 )之后出现的目标词(例如 )进行词汇判断。尽管在美国英语中,两个不同元音的语音类别有相当大的重叠,但当启动词元音跨越元音类别边界(例如 )时,根据缺乏启动效应的评估,这种变化不被视为可容忍的变异。与用新西兰英语听众进行的同一实验结果相比,在新西兰英语听众的实验中这种启动词变异是被容忍的,我们的实验支持了这样一种观点,即音系表征在指导从声学信号到抽象心理表征的映射过程中很重要。我们将结合当前的言语感知模型和脑成像研究的最新发现来讨论我们的研究结果。

相似文献

1
Sparseness of vowel category structure: Evidence from English dialect comparison.
Lingua. 2014 Feb 1;140:35-51. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.11.007.
2
Australian English listeners' perception of Japanese vowel length reveals underlying phonological knowledge.
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 26;14:1122471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122471. eCollection 2023.
3
The mental representation of lexical form: a phonological approach to the recognition lexicon.
Cognition. 1991 Mar;38(3):245-94. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90008-r.
4
Height differences in English dialects: consequences for processing and representation.
Lang Speech. 2010;53(Pt 2):245-72. doi: 10.1177/0023830909357154.
5
Effects of Lexical Competition and Dialect Exposure on Phonological Priming.
Lang Speech. 2017 Mar;60(1):85-109. doi: 10.1177/0023830916643737. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
6
Spoken word recognition in a second language: The importance of phonetic details.
Second Lang Res. 2023 Apr;39(2):333-362. doi: 10.1177/02676583211030604. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
7
Asymmetries in the processing of vowel height.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Jun;55(3):903-18. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0065). Epub 2012 Jan 9.
8
Social Priming in Speech Perception: Revisiting Kangaroo/Kiwi Priming in New Zealand English.
Brain Sci. 2022 May 24;12(6):684. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12060684.
9
Gradient and categorical patterns of spoken-word recognition and processing of phonetic details.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jul;81(5):1654-1672. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01693-9.
10
Unstressed Vowel Reduction Across Majorcan Catalan Dialects: Production and Spoken Word Recognition.
Lang Speech. 2018 Sep;61(3):430-465. doi: 10.1177/0023830917736019. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Implicit schemata and categories in memory-based language processing.
Lang Speech. 2013 Sep;56(Pt 3):309-28. doi: 10.1177/0023830913484902.
2
Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification.
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Sep;2(3):339-63. doi: 10.3758/BF03210972.
3
Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.
Percept Psychophys. 1973 Jun 1;13(2):253-260. doi: 10.3758/BF03214136.
5
Auditory Sensitivity to Formant Ratios:Toward an Account of Vowel Normalization.
Lang Cogn Process. 2010 Jul;25(6):808-839. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2010.490047.
7
Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models.
J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):434-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007.
8
Electrophysiological evidence for an early processing of human voices.
BMC Neurosci. 2009 Oct 20;10:127. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-127.
9
"Who" is saying "what"? Brain-based decoding of human voice and speech.
Science. 2008 Nov 7;322(5903):970-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1164318.
10
On the role of regular phonological variation in lexical access: evidence from voice assimilation in French.
Cognition. 2008 Aug;108(2):512-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Apr 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验