Özgüner Meltem, Azık Mehmet Fatih, Tavil Betül, Bozkaya Ikbal, Köksal Yasin, Canal Elif, Uçkan Duygu, Tunç Bahattin
Stem Cell Research Laboratory, Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Ankara Children's Hematology Oncology Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Ankara Children's Hematology Oncology Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Ankara Children's Hematology Oncology Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Transfus Apher Sci. 2014 Jun;50(3):467-72. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2014.02.018. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
The study was designed to compare colony forming capacity of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) stimulated bone marrow (G-BM) with standard unstimulated bone marrow (U-BM) of healthy donors of pediatric patients. CFU-Assay results of 26 healthy donors of pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were analyzed retrospectively. 13 of donors received 10 μg/kg per day of G-CSF as a single injection for 3 consecutive days and other 13 of donors had unstimulated BM. Colony forming capacity of hematopoietic stem cells evaluated with Colony Forming Unit-Assay (CFU-Assay) with in semi-solid agar culture medium after 14-18 days of culture period. CFU-Assay results of G-BM and U-BM (expressed as means) were; Burst Forming Unit-Erythroid (BFU-E): 15.20 × 10(4)/kg and 8.38 × 10(4)/kg, Colony Forming Unit-Granulocyte Macrophage (CFU-GM): 10.35 × 10(4)/kg and 5.67 × 10(4)/kg, Colony Forming Unit-Erythroid (CFU-E): 0.59 × 10(4)/kg and 0.33 × 10(4)/kg, CFU-Granulocyte Erythroid Macrophage Megakaryocyte (CFU-GEMM): 0.52 × 10(4)/kg and 0.53 × 10(4)/kg respectively. BFU-E and CFU-GM capacity of G-BM was increased and statistically significantly different than standard U-BM (p ⩽ 0.01). In conclusion, increased colony forming capacity of hematopoietic stem cells of G-BM when compared with standard unstimulated BM could be a major advantage for transplantation.
本研究旨在比较粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)刺激的骨髓(G-BM)与儿科患者健康供者的标准未刺激骨髓(U-BM)的集落形成能力。对26例接受异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的儿科患者健康供者的集落形成单位分析(CFU分析)结果进行回顾性分析。13例供者连续3天每天接受10μg/kg的G-CSF单次注射,另外13例供者有未刺激的骨髓。培养14 - 18天后,在半固体琼脂培养基中用集落形成单位分析(CFU分析)评估造血干细胞的集落形成能力。G-BM和U-BM的CFU分析结果(以均值表示)分别为:爆式红系集落形成单位(BFU-E):15.20×10⁴/kg和8.38×10⁴/kg,粒-巨噬细胞集落形成单位(CFU-GM):10.35×10⁴/kg和5.67×10⁴/kg,红系集落形成单位(CFU-E):0.59×10⁴/kg和0.33×10⁴/kg,粒-红-巨-核系集落形成单位(CFU-GEMM):0.52×10⁴/kg和0.53×10⁴/kg。G-BM的BFU-E和CFU-GM能力增加,且与标准U-BM相比有统计学显著差异(p⩽0.01)。总之,与标准未刺激骨髓相比,G-BM的造血干细胞集落形成能力增加可能是移植的一个主要优势。