Suppr超能文献

股腘动脉疾病血管内治疗的随机试验:系统评价与荟萃分析(第1部分:膝上)

Randomized trials for endovascular treatment of infrainguinal arterial disease: systematic review and meta-analysis (Part 1: Above the knee).

作者信息

Jens S, Conijn A P, Koelemay M J W, Bipat S, Reekers J A

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 May;47(5):524-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate 1 to 36 month follow-up outcomes of different endovascular treatment strategies in above-the-knee (ATK) arterial segments in patients with intermittent claudication (IC) and critical limb ischemia (CLI).

METHODS

Studies indexed in Medline and Embase from 1980 to November 2013 of randomized controlled trials comparing balloon angioplasty (PTA) or drug-eluting balloon (DEB) with optional bailout stenting, or primary stenting using a bare stent (BS) or drug-eluting stent (DES) to one another were included. Methodological quality of each trial was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool, and quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system. Outcomes assessed were quality of life, walking capacity evaluated by treadmill or questionnaire, change in Rutherford classification, target lesion revascularization (TLR), bypass, binary restenosis, late lumen loss, stenosis grade, amputation, death, major adverse cardiac events, or event-free survival with follow-up periods of at least 1 month.

RESULTS

Twenty-three trials including 3314 patients in total were identified. Eighty-five per cent patients had IC and 15% CLI. Fifteen trials showed no systematic benefit of BS over PTA. One trial comparing DES and PTA reported no significant differences in walking capacity or Rutherford classification. Four trials showed a beneficial effect on TLR rate, but not on Rutherford classification of DEB compared with PTA. In four trials DES did not systematically perform better than BS.

CONCLUSION

In general, performing PTA with optional bailout stenting for ATK lesions is the preferred strategy in patients with IC. For CLI, more studies are needed for recommending an optimal treatment strategy.

摘要

目的

评估间歇性跛行(IC)和严重肢体缺血(CLI)患者膝上(ATK)动脉节段不同血管内治疗策略的1至36个月随访结果。

方法

纳入1980年至2013年11月在Medline和Embase中索引的随机对照试验研究,这些研究比较了球囊血管成形术(PTA)或药物洗脱球囊(DEB)联合选择性补救支架置入术,或使用裸支架(BS)或药物洗脱支架(DES)的原发性支架置入术。使用Cochrane协作工具评估每个试验的方法学质量,并使用GRADE系统评估证据质量。评估的结果包括生活质量、通过跑步机或问卷评估的步行能力、卢瑟福分类的变化、靶病变血管重建(TLR)、搭桥手术、二元再狭窄、晚期管腔丢失、狭窄程度、截肢、死亡、主要不良心脏事件或至少随访1个月的无事件生存期。

结果

共确定了23项试验,总计3314例患者。85%的患者患有IC,15%患有CLI。15项试验表明,与PTA相比,BS没有系统性优势。一项比较DES和PTA的试验报告称,步行能力或卢瑟福分类没有显著差异。四项试验表明,与PTA相比,DEB对TLR率有有益影响,但对卢瑟福分类没有影响。在四项试验中,DES没有系统性地比BS表现更好。

结论

一般来说,对于IC患者,对ATK病变进行PTA联合选择性补救支架置入术是首选策略。对于CLI,需要更多研究来推荐最佳治疗策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验