Departments of *Obstetrics and Gynecology and †Pathology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 May;24(4):697-702. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000113.
Isolated para-aortic lymph node metastases are rare in patients with endometrial carcinoma. We wanted to determine the reliability of macroscopic pelvic lymph node findings at surgery in predicting para-aortic space involvement in these patients.
We identified all women with surgically treated endometrial carcinoma at our institution between January 2008 and February 2013 (n = 854). One hundred seventeen patients received pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy. Lymph nodes were considered grossly positive based on size and morphology.
In patients who underwent comprehensive lymphadenectomy, grossly positive pelvic nodes predicted para-aortic metastasis with a sensitivity of 52.4% and specificity of 93.8%. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 8.4 and 0.51, respectively. The predictive power of grossly positive pelvic nodes remained significant (odds ratio, 18; 95% confidence interval, 4.1-78; P < 0.0001) after correcting for deep myometrial invasion, poor tumor differentiation, and nonendometrioid histology as confounders. The whole sample of 854 patients was used for Bayesian calculations. The cutoff for a clinically useful test was set at the negative predictive value of 98.0%. The negative predictive value of the test (ie, grossly positive pelvic nodes at surgery in predicting the likelihood of para-aortic metastasis) was 99.7% for patients with superficial grade 1 to 2 endometrioid carcinomas and 98.0% for patients with deeply invasive grade 1 to 2 endometrioid carcinomas. For patients with grade 3 endometrioid and nonendometrioid carcinomas, the negative predictive values were 97.3% and 92.2%, respectively. For the whole study population, the value was 98.4%.
When uterine factors are used for risk stratification of endometrial carcinomas, selective para-aortic lymphadenectomy, based on gross findings of pelvic nodes, is feasible for patients with grade 1 to 2 endometrioid carcinomas, regardless of the depth of myometrial invasion. Similarly, gross findings of pelvic nodes can be used to evaluate the need for para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the strategy of routine pelvic lymphadenectomy.
孤立性腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移在子宫内膜癌患者中较为罕见。我们旨在确定手术时盆腔淋巴结的大体发现预测这些患者腹主动脉受累的可靠性。
我们在 2008 年 1 月至 2013 年 2 月期间确定了我院接受手术治疗的所有子宫内膜癌患者(n=854)。117 例患者接受了盆腔-主动脉淋巴结切除术。根据大小和形态,淋巴结被认为是大体阳性。
在接受全面淋巴结清扫术的患者中,大体阳性的盆腔淋巴结对腹主动脉转移的预测具有 52.4%的敏感性和 93.8%的特异性。阳性和阴性似然比分别为 8.4 和 0.51。在纠正了深肌层浸润、肿瘤分化不良和非子宫内膜样组织学作为混杂因素后,大体阳性盆腔淋巴结的预测能力仍然显著(优势比,18;95%置信区间,4.1-78;P<0.0001)。854 例患者的整个样本用于贝叶斯计算。将临床有用的测试的截断值设定为阴性预测值为 98.0%。该测试的阴性预测值(即手术时大体阳性的盆腔淋巴结预测腹主动脉转移的可能性)在浅表分级 1 至 2 子宫内膜样癌患者中为 99.7%,在深肌层浸润分级 1 至 2 子宫内膜样癌患者中为 98.0%。对于分级 3 子宫内膜样癌和非子宫内膜样癌患者,阴性预测值分别为 97.3%和 92.2%。对于整个研究人群,该值为 98.4%。
当使用子宫因素对子宫内膜癌进行风险分层时,对于分级 1 至 2 子宫内膜样癌患者,基于盆腔淋巴结的大体发现,选择性腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术是可行的,而与肌层浸润深度无关。同样,盆腔淋巴结的大体发现可用于评估常规盆腔淋巴结清扫术策略中是否需要进行腹主动脉淋巴结清扫术。