Evans S, Ramasamy A, Deshmukh S C
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham, B18 7QH, United Kingdom.
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham, B18 7QH, United Kingdom; The Royal British Legion Centre for Blast Injury Studies, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2BW, United Kingdom.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 May;100(3):293-5. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.11.014. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
Fractures of the distal radius are common, with volar locking plates being increasingly used in their treatment. They aim to provide stable internal fixation and are designed to mirror the natural anatomy. Current volar plate designs incorporate a volar cortical angle (VCA) of 25 degrees.
The aim of this study is to determine whether the VCA in uninjured distal radii corresponds accurately with modern volar plate designs.
A retrospective radiological analysis utilizing Computed Tomography scans to assess the VCA of 100 distal radii. Each distal radius was subjected to 3 measurements of the VCA in the sagittal plane.
One hundred patients were identified (67 male, 33 female; mean age 37.4 years). The mean VCA was 32.9 degrees (S.D.±5.14 degrees). The VCA in male patients was significantly greater than in females (33.6 vs 31.5 degrees; P=0.04). There was a statistically significant difference between the lateral VCA and medial VCA (32.2 vs 34.3 degrees, P=0.02).
Our study clearly demonstrates that the VCA measured in the distal radius is significantly greater than the volar angulation incorporated within modern plate design. Given that the aim of ORIF is to anatomically reconstruct the distal radius, our study highlights that this may not be possible with current plates.
Level IV Retrospective case series.
桡骨远端骨折很常见,掌侧锁定钢板在其治疗中的应用越来越广泛。这些钢板旨在提供稳定的内固定,并设计成模仿自然解剖结构。目前的掌侧钢板设计包含25度的掌侧皮质角(VCA)。
本研究的目的是确定未受伤桡骨远端的VCA是否与现代掌侧钢板设计准确对应。
利用计算机断层扫描进行回顾性放射学分析,以评估100个桡骨远端的VCA。每个桡骨远端在矢状面进行3次VCA测量。
共纳入100例患者(男67例,女33例;平均年龄37.4岁)。平均VCA为32.9度(标准差±5.14度)。男性患者的VCA显著大于女性(33.6度对31.5度;P = 0.04)。外侧VCA和内侧VCA之间存在统计学显著差异(32.2度对34.3度,P = 0.02)。
我们的研究清楚地表明,桡骨远端测量的VCA显著大于现代钢板设计中的掌侧成角。鉴于切开复位内固定的目的是在解剖学上重建桡骨远端,我们的研究强调使用当前的钢板可能无法做到这一点。
IV级回顾性病例系列。