Suppr超能文献

年轻心律失常患者的精神功能和生活质量。

Psychiatric functioning and quality of life in young patients with cardiac rhythm devices.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois;

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2014 Apr;133(4):e964-72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1394. Epub 2014 Mar 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Less is known about depression, anxiety and quality of life (QoL) in children and adolescents with pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) than is known in adults with these devices.

METHODS

A standardized psychiatric interview diagnosed anxiety/depressive disorders in a cross-sectional study. Self-report measures of anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder were obtained. Medical disease severity, family functioning and QoL data were collected. A total of 166 patients were enrolled (52 ICD, 114 PM; median age 15 years).

RESULTS

Prevalence of current and lifetime psychiatric disorders was higher in patients with ICDs than PMs (Current: 27% vs. 11%, P = .02; Lifetime: 52% ICD vs. 34% PM, P = .01). Patients with ICDs had more anxiety than a healthy population (25% vs. 7%, P < .01). Patients with ICDs and PMs had similar levels of depression as a healthy population (ICD 10%, PM 4%, reference 4%, P = .29). In multivariate analysis including a medical disease score, demographics, exposure to beta-blockers, activity limitations, hospitalizations, shocks and procedures, the type of device (PM versus ICD) did not predict psychiatric diagnoses when age at implantation and the severity of medical disease were controlled for. Patients with ICDs and PMs had lower physical QoL scores (ICD 45, PM 47.5, Norm 53, P ≤ .03), but similar psychosocial functioning scores (ICD 49, PM 51, Norm 51, P ≥ .16) versus a normal reference population.

CONCLUSIONS

Anxiety is highly prevalent in young patients with ICDs, but the higher rates can be attributed to medical disease severity and age at implantation instead of type of device.

摘要

背景

起搏器(PM)和植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)植入的儿童和青少年的抑郁、焦虑和生活质量(QoL)情况比成年患者了解得少。

方法

在一项横断面研究中,采用标准化精神科访谈来诊断焦虑/抑郁障碍。使用自我报告的焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激障碍量表来获取数据。同时收集了医疗疾病严重程度、家庭功能和生活质量数据。共纳入 166 名患者(ICD 组 52 例,PM 组 114 例;中位年龄 15 岁)。

结果

与 PM 组相比,ICD 组患者当前和终身精神障碍的患病率更高(当前:27%比 11%,P =.02;终生:52% ICD 比 34% PM,P =.01)。ICD 组患者的焦虑程度高于健康人群(25%比 7%,P <.01)。ICD 组和 PM 组患者的抑郁程度与健康人群相似(ICD 组 10%,PM 组 4%,参考组 4%,P =.29)。在包括医疗疾病评分、人口统计学因素、β受体阻滞剂暴露、活动受限、住院、电击和程序等因素的多变量分析中,当控制植入年龄和医疗疾病严重程度时,设备类型(PM 与 ICD)并不能预测精神科诊断。与正常参考人群相比,ICD 组和 PM 组患者的身体 QoL 评分较低(ICD 组 45,PM 组 47.5,参考组 53,P ≤.03),但心理社会功能评分相似(ICD 组 49,PM 组 51,参考组 51,P ≥.16)。

结论

焦虑在年轻的 ICD 患者中很常见,但较高的发生率可归因于医疗疾病的严重程度和植入年龄,而不是设备类型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验