Jain Vaishali, Agrawal Vandana, Biswas Shubho
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2012 Jul-Dec;24(3-4):68-70.
Though formative assessments are popular in medical education, but data to establish their educational benefits are lacking. This study was conducted to determine whether participation and performance of MBBS students in regular formative assessments are associated with positive outcomes and has measurable effects on learning.
One hundred and fifty MBBS students of semester II attending Biochemistry classes were studied by dividing into two groups till the completion of a topic. End-of-topic summative assessment marks were analysed with respect to the effect of participation and performance in formative assessments.
Participation in formative assessments had a statistically significant positive relationship with summative assessment marks. Mean difference in formative and summative assessment marks for group that participated in formative assessments is 1.6 (95% CI = 0.9-2.4, p < 0.001). The mean difference in summative assessment marks for two groups is 3.4 (95% CI = 2.3-4.6, p < 0.001). The mean difference in marks obtained by solving case studies given in Summative Assessment for two groups is 1.2 (95% CI = 0.7-1.6, p < 0.001).
Formative assessment not only assesses students' achievements but it also enables students to recognise the areas in which they are having difficulty and to concentrate their future efforts on those areas. Adequate frequency of formative assessment with immediate feedback is beneficial as it stimulates meaningful and multifaceted learning. The results of this study encourage the use of formative assessment as an educational tool in all MBBS subjects for they have significant positive effects on learning.
尽管形成性评估在医学教育中很受欢迎,但缺乏确定其教育益处的数据。本研究旨在确定医学学士(MBBS)学生在定期形成性评估中的参与度和表现是否与积极结果相关,以及对学习是否有可衡量的影响。
选取150名正在上生物化学课的二年级MBBS学生,在一个主题结束前将他们分成两组进行研究。针对形成性评估中的参与度和表现的影响,分析主题结束时的总结性评估成绩。
参与形成性评估与总结性评估成绩之间存在统计学上显著的正相关关系。参与形成性评估的组在形成性评估和总结性评估成绩上的平均差异为1.6(95%置信区间 = 0.9 - 2.4,p < 0.001)。两组在总结性评估成绩上的平均差异为3.4(95%置信区间 = 2.3 - 4.6,p < 0.001)。两组在总结性评估中解决案例研究所得分数的平均差异为1.2(95%置信区间 = 0.7 - 1.6,p < 0.001)。
形成性评估不仅能评估学生的成绩,还能使学生认识到自己有困难的领域,并将未来的努力集中在这些领域。适当频率的形成性评估并给予即时反馈是有益的,因为它能促进有意义的多方面学习。本研究结果鼓励在所有MBBS科目中使用形成性评估作为一种教育工具,因为它们对学习有显著的积极影响。