中国学龄前儿童中养育方式与主动攻击和反应性攻击之间的关系。
Relationship between parenting and proactive versus reactive aggression among Chinese preschool children.
作者信息
Jia Shoumei, Wang Ling, Shi Yingjuan
机构信息
School of Nursing, Fudan University, No. 305, Feng Lin Road, Shanghai, P.R.C., 200032.
School of Public Health, Fudan University, No. 130, Dong An Road, Shanghai, P.R.C., 200032.
出版信息
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2014 Apr;28(2):152-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2013.12.001. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
This study examines the relationship between parenting and proactive versus reactive aggression among preschool children in China. Children (1164) from 10 kindergartens in Shanghai were rated by their parents and teachers using the Parent Behavior Inventory (PBI) and the Aggressive Behavior-Teacher's Checklist. Children had higher levels of reactive than proactive aggression, and older children and boys had higher levels of both proactive and reactive aggression. Hostile/coercive parenting style and low father education were significantly linked to aggression in children. These findings suggest that parenting style and type of aggression should be addressed when considering prevention and intervention.
本研究探讨了中国学龄前儿童养育方式与主动攻击和反应性攻击之间的关系。来自上海10所幼儿园的1164名儿童，由其父母和教师分别使用父母行为量表（PBI）和攻击性行为教师检查表进行评分。儿童的反应性攻击水平高于主动攻击水平，年龄较大的儿童和男孩的主动攻击和反应性攻击水平都较高。敌意/强制型养育方式和父亲低教育水平与儿童攻击行为显著相关。这些发现表明，在考虑预防和干预措施时，应关注养育方式和攻击行为类型。
Zotero 插件