Liaw Winston, Petterson Stephen, Rabin David L, Bazemore Andrew
Department of Family Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, 3650 Joseph Siewick Drive, No. 400 Fairfax, Richmond, VA 22033, USA.
The Robert Graham Center, 1133 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
Int J Family Med. 2014;2014:842847. doi: 10.1155/2014/842847. Epub 2014 Feb 9.
Background. Finding a usual source of care (USC) is difficult for certain populations. This analysis determines how insurance type and having a USC affect the settings in which patients seek care. Methods. In this cross-sectional study of the 2000-2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys, we assessed the percentage of low-income persons with half or more of their ambulatory visits to the emergency department (ED). Respondents were stratified based on insurance type and presence of a USC. Results. In 2011, among Medicaid enrollees without USCs, 21.6% had half or more of their ambulatory visits to EDs compared to 8.1% for those with USCs. Among the uninsured without USCs, 24.1% went to an ED for half or more of their ambulatory visits compared to 8.8% for those with USCs in 2011. Among the privately insured without USCs, 7.8% went to an ED for half or more of their ambulatory visits compared to 5.0% for those with USCs in 2011. These differences remained in multivariate analyses. Conclusions. Those who lack USCs, particularly the uninsured and Medicaid enrollees, are more likely to rely on EDs.
背景。对于某些人群而言,找到常规医疗服务来源(USC)颇具难度。本分析旨在确定保险类型和拥有常规医疗服务来源如何影响患者寻求医疗服务的场所。方法。在这项针对2000 - 2011年医疗支出面板调查的横断面研究中,我们评估了门诊就诊半数或更多次数在急诊科(ED)的低收入人群的比例。受访者根据保险类型和是否有常规医疗服务来源进行分层。结果。2011年,在没有常规医疗服务来源的医疗补助参保者中,21.6%的人门诊就诊半数或更多次数在急诊科,而有常规医疗服务来源的这一比例为8.1%。在没有常规医疗服务来源的未参保者中,24.1%的人门诊就诊半数或更多次数在急诊科,相比之下,2011年有常规医疗服务来源的这一比例为8.8%。在没有常规医疗服务来源的私人保险参保者中,7.8%的人门诊就诊半数或更多次数在急诊科,而2011年有常规医疗服务来源的这一比例为5.0%。这些差异在多变量分析中依然存在。结论。那些没有常规医疗服务来源的人,尤其是未参保者和医疗补助参保者,更有可能依赖急诊科。