Univ. de Bordeaux, ISVV, EA 4577, Unité de recherche Œnologie, 33140 Villenave d'Ornon, France; Bordeaux Sciences Agro, 33175 Gradignan, France.
INRA, ISVV, USC 1219 OENOLOGIE, 33140 Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2014 May 16;178:87-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.03.009. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
Yeast species of Hanseniaspora and Candida genus are predominant during the early stages of winemaking, while species of Metschnikowia, Pichia, Zygoascus, Issatchenkia, Torulaspora and other genera are present at lower population levels. The impact of common oenological practices on yeast dynamics during the prefermentative stage and the early stage of alcoholic fermentation (AF) remains elusive. In this work, the effect of four prefermentative oenological practices (clarification degree, temperature, sulphite and starter yeast addition) on yeast dynamics was evaluated in a Chardonnay grape must. The growth curves of four genus or species, namely Saccharomyces spp., Hanseniaspora spp., Candida zemplinina and Torulaspora delbrueckii, were followed by quantitative PCR. The fermentation kinetics were also recorded, as well as the production of acetic acid. Variance analysis allowed determining the effect of each practice and their interaction factors, as well as their relative importance on yeast dynamics and fermentation kinetics. Our experimental design showed that the population dynamics of the four species were differently impacted by the oenological practices, with some species being more sensitive than others to the clarification degree (C. zemplinina), sulphite addition (Saccharomyces spp.), starter yeast inoculation (Hanseniaspora spp.) or prefermentation temperature (T. delbrueckii). Significant interaction effects between practices were revealed, highlighting the interest of experimental design allowing interaction analysis, as some factors may buffer the effect of other ones. Hanseniaspora genus showed atypical behaviour: growth dynamics showed a decrease during AF that we interpreted as early cellular lysis. In conclusion, this study provides new insights on the impact of common oenological practices on the dynamics of non-Saccharomyces yeast that will be useful for a better management of mixed fermentation between S. cerevisiae and non-Saccharomyces yeasts.
在酿酒的早期阶段,汉逊酵母属和假丝酵母属的酵母是优势物种,而梅奇酵母属、毕赤酵母属、酒香酵母属、伊萨酵母属、毕赤酵母属和其他属的酵母则以较低的种群水平存在。常见的酿造工艺对预发酵和酒精发酵早期酵母动态的影响仍然难以捉摸。在这项工作中,评估了在霞多丽葡萄汁中四种预发酵酿造工艺(澄清度、温度、亚硫酸盐和酵母接种量)对酵母动态的影响。通过定量 PCR 跟踪了四个属或种(酿酒酵母、汉逊酵母属、近平滑假丝酵母和德巴利酒香酵母)的生长曲线。还记录了发酵动力学以及乙酸的产生。方差分析允许确定每种工艺及其相互作用因素的影响,以及它们对酵母动态和发酵动力学的相对重要性。我们的实验设计表明,四种酵母的种群动态受到酿造工艺的不同影响,一些物种比其他物种对澄清度(近平滑假丝酵母)、亚硫酸盐添加(酿酒酵母)、酵母接种量(汉逊酵母属)或预发酵温度(德巴利酒香酵母)更敏感。揭示了工艺之间的显著相互作用效应,突出了实验设计允许进行相互作用分析的重要性,因为某些因素可能会缓冲其他因素的影响。汉逊酵母属表现出异常行为:在酒精发酵过程中,生长动力学显示出下降,我们将其解释为早期细胞裂解。总之,本研究为常见酿造工艺对非酿酒酵母动态的影响提供了新的见解,这对于更好地管理酿酒酵母和非酿酒酵母混合发酵将是有用的。