*Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ob/Gyn and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; and †Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 May;24(4):779-86. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000126.
The objectives of this study were to describe the rate and predictors of surgical site infection (SSI) after gynecologic cancer surgery and identify any association between SSI and postoperative outcome.
Patients with endometrial, cervical, or ovarian cancers from 2005 to 2011 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. The extent of surgical intervention was categorized into modified surgical complexity scoring (MSCS) system. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used. Odds ratios were adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative laboratory values, and operative factors.
Of 6854 patients, 369 (5.4%) were diagnosed with SSI. Surgical site infection after laparotomy was 3.5 times higher compared with minimally invasive surgery (7% vs 2%; P < 0.001). Among laparotomy group, independent predictors of SSI included endometrial cancer diagnosis, obesity, ascites, preoperative anemia, American Society of Anesthesiologists class greater than or equal to 3, MSCS greater than or equal to 3, and perioperative blood transfusion. Among laparoscopic cases, independent predictors of SSI included only preoperative leukocytosis and overweight. For patients with deep or organ space SSI, significant predictors included hypoalbuminemia, preoperative weight loss, respiratory comorbidities, MSCS greater than 4, and perioperative blood transfusion for laparotomy and only preoperative leukocytosis for minimally invasive surgery. Surgical site infection was associated with longer mean hospital stay and higher rate of reoperation, sepsis, and wound dehiscence. Surgical site infection was not associated with increased risk of acute renal failure or 30-day mortality. These findings were consistent in subset of patients with deep or organ space SSI.
Seven percent of patients undergoing laparotomy for gynecologic malignancy developed SSI. Surgical site infection is associated with longer hospital stay and more than 5-fold increased risk of reoperation. In this study, we identified several risk factors for developing SSI among gynecologic cancer patients. These findings may contribute toward identification of patients at risk for SSI and the development of strategies to reduce SSI rate and potentially reduce the cost of care in gynecologic cancer surgery.
本研究旨在描述妇科癌症手术后手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率和预测因素,并确定 SSI 与术后结果之间的任何关联。
从美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划中确定了 2005 年至 2011 年患有子宫内膜癌、宫颈癌或卵巢癌的患者。手术干预的程度分为改良手术复杂程度评分(MSCS)系统。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析。对患者人口统计学、合并症、术前实验室值和手术因素进行调整后,计算比值比。
在 6854 例患者中,369 例(5.4%)被诊断为 SSI。与微创手术相比,剖腹手术后 SSI 的发生率高 3.5 倍(7%比 2%;P<0.001)。在剖腹手术组中,SSI 的独立预测因素包括子宫内膜癌诊断、肥胖、腹水、术前贫血、美国麻醉医师协会分级≥3 级、MSCS≥3 级和围手术期输血。在腹腔镜病例中,SSI 的独立预测因素仅包括术前白细胞增多和超重。对于深部或器官间隙 SSI 的患者,显著的预测因素包括低白蛋白血症、术前体重减轻、呼吸合并症、MSCS>4 级和剖腹手术围手术期输血以及微创手术仅术前白细胞增多。SSI 与平均住院时间延长和再手术、脓毒症和伤口裂开的发生率增加有关。SSI 与急性肾衰竭或 30 天死亡率增加无关。这些发现与深部或器官间隙 SSI 的患者亚组一致。
7%接受妇科恶性肿瘤剖腹手术的患者发生 SSI。SSI 与住院时间延长和再手术风险增加 5 倍以上有关。在这项研究中,我们确定了妇科癌症患者发生 SSI 的一些危险因素。这些发现可能有助于确定 SSI 风险患者,并制定降低 SSI 发生率的策略,从而降低妇科癌症手术的医疗成本。