Suppr超能文献

美沙酮危害及相对危害方面的研究空白:美国疼痛学会和药物依赖问题学院临床实践指南证据综述的结果

Research gaps on methadone harms and comparative harms: findings from a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society and College on Problems of Drug Dependence clinical practice guideline.

作者信息

Weimer Melissa B, Chou Roger

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

出版信息

J Pain. 2014 Apr;15(4):366-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.01.496.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Methadone-associated overdose deaths have dramatically increased. In order to inform an evidence-based clinical practice guideline to improve safety of methadone prescribing, the American Pain Society commissioned a systematic review on various aspects related to methadone safety. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO databases through July 2012 to identify studies that addressed 1 or more of 17 Key Questions related to methadone safety; an update search was performed in 2014 for new studies related to methadone-related overdose and risks related to cardiac arrhythmias. A total of 168 studies met inclusion criteria for the review. The purpose of this article is to highlight critical research gaps in the literature related to methadone safety. These include lack of evidence on risk factors associated with methadone-overdose deaths and adverse events, limited evidence to evaluate the comparative mortality of methadone versus other opioids, insufficient evidence to fully understand the harms associated with methadone use during pregnancy, and insufficient evidence to determine effects of risk mitigation strategies such as electrocardiogram monitoring, strategies for managing patients with prolonged QTc intervals on screening, urine drug testing, alternative dosing regimens for initiation and titration of therapy, and timing of follow-up. Therefore, most guideline recommendations are based on weak evidence. More research is needed to guide safe methadone prescribing practices and decrease the adverse events associated with methadone.

PERSPECTIVE

This article summarizes critical research gaps in the literature related to methadone safety, based on a systematic review commissioned by the American Pain Society. Critical research gaps were identified in a number of areas, highlighting the need for additional research to guide safer prescribing and risk mitigation strategies.

摘要

未标注

与美沙酮相关的过量用药死亡人数急剧增加。为制定一项基于证据的临床实践指南以提高美沙酮处方的安全性,美国疼痛协会委托对与美沙酮安全性相关的各个方面进行系统评价。我们检索了截至2012年7月的Ovid MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆和PsycINFO数据库,以识别涉及与美沙酮安全性相关的17个关键问题中1个或更多问题的研究;2014年进行了更新检索,以查找与美沙酮相关的过量用药及心律失常风险相关的新研究。共有168项研究符合该评价的纳入标准。本文的目的是突出文献中与美沙酮安全性相关的关键研究空白。这些空白包括缺乏与美沙酮过量用药死亡和不良事件相关的危险因素的证据、评估美沙酮与其他阿片类药物相对死亡率的证据有限、充分了解孕期使用美沙酮相关危害的证据不足,以及确定风险缓解策略(如心电图监测、对QTc间期延长患者的管理策略、筛查、尿液药物检测、治疗起始和滴定的替代给药方案以及随访时间)效果的证据不足。因此,大多数指南建议基于薄弱的证据。需要更多研究来指导安全的美沙酮处方实践并减少与美沙酮相关的不良事件。

观点

本文基于美国疼痛协会委托进行的系统评价,总结了文献中与美沙酮安全性相关的关键研究空白。在多个领域确定了关键研究空白,突出了进行更多研究以指导更安全的处方和风险缓解策略的必要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验