Division of Cardiology, Ospedale "Maggiore della Carità", Eastern Piedmont University, C.so Mazzini, 18, 24100, Novara, Italy,
Clin Res Cardiol. 2014 Sep;103(9):685-99. doi: 10.1007/s00392-014-0702-6. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
Several concerns have emerged on the higher risk of in-stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, especially in the setting of STEMI patients. Few data have even been reported in high-risk patients, such as those with anterior MI. Therefore this represents the aim of the current study.
The literature was scanned by formal searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE and CENTRAL). We examined all completed randomized trials of DES for STEMI. The following key words were used for study selection: randomized trial, myocardial infarction, reperfusion, primary angioplasty, stenting, DES, sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), Cypher, paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), Taxus. No language restrictions were enforced.
Individual patient's data were obtained from 11 out of 13 trials, including a total of 2,782 patients with anterior MI [1,739 or 62.5% randomized to DES and 1,043 or 37.5% randomized to bare-metal stent (BMS)]. At long-term follow-up, no significant benefit was observed with DES as compared to BMS in terms of mortality [9.8 vs 10.9%, HR (95% CI) = 0.81 (0.61, 1.07), p = 0.13, p heterogeneity = 0.18], reinfarction [8.8 vs 6.4%, respectively; HR (95% CI) = 1.14 (0.80, 1.61), p = 0.47, p heterogeneity = 0.82], and stent thrombosis [5.6 vs 5%, OR (95% CI) = 0.88 (0.59, 1.30), p = 0.51, p heterogeneity = 0.65], whereas DES was associated with a significant reduction in terms of target-vessel revascularization (TVR) [13.7 vs 23.4%; OR (95% CI) = 0.56 (0.46, 0.69), p < 0.0001, p het = 0.81] that was observed at both early (within 1 year) [7 vs 14.7%, HR (95% CI) = 0.56 (0.46, 0.69), p < 0.0001, p het = 0.81] and late (>1 year) follow-up [7.2 vs 9%, HR (95% CI) = 0.67 (0.47, 0.96), p = 0.03, p het = 0.96].
This study showed that among patients with anterior STEMI undergoing primary angioplasty, SES and PES, as compared to BMS, are associated with a significant reduction in TVR at long-term follow-up. No concerns were found with the use of first-generation DES in terms of mortality.
药物洗脱支架(DES)植入后,支架内血栓形成的风险较高,这引起了人们的关注,尤其是在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中。在高危患者中,如前壁心肌梗死患者,甚至报告了更少的数据。因此,这是目前研究的目的。
通过对电子数据库(MEDLINE 和 CENTRAL)进行正式检索,扫描文献。我们检查了所有关于 DES 治疗 STEMI 的完成随机试验。使用以下关键词进行研究选择:随机试验、心肌梗死、再灌注、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、支架置入、DES、西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)、Cypher、紫杉醇洗脱支架(PES)、Taxus。没有执行语言限制。
从 13 项试验中的 11 项获得了患者的个体数据,共包括 2782 例前壁心肌梗死患者[1739 例(62.5%)随机分配至 DES 组,1043 例(37.5%)随机分配至裸金属支架(BMS)组]。在长期随访中,与 BMS 相比,DES 并未显示出在死亡率方面的显著获益[9.8%对 10.9%,HR(95%CI)=0.81(0.61,1.07),p=0.13,p 异质性=0.18]、再梗死[8.8%对 6.4%,HR(95%CI)=1.14(0.80,1.61),p=0.47,p 异质性=0.82]和支架内血栓形成[5.6%对 5%,OR(95%CI)=0.88(0.59,1.30),p=0.51,p 异质性=0.65],但 DES 与靶血管血运重建(TVR)显著减少相关[13.7%对 23.4%;OR(95%CI)=0.56(0.46,0.69),p<0.0001,p 异质性=0.81],这在早期(1 年内)[7%对 14.7%,HR(95%CI)=0.56(0.46,0.69),p<0.0001,p 异质性=0.81]和晚期(>1 年)随访中均观察到[7.2%对 9%,HR(95%CI)=0.67(0.47,0.96),p=0.03,p 异质性=0.96]。
本研究表明,在前壁 STEMI 患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时,与 BMS 相比,SES 和 PES 与长期随访时 TVR 的显著减少相关。在死亡率方面,第一代 DES 的使用没有发现任何问题。