Ijo Immanuel, Feyerharm Jeffrey
Asante Health System. Medford, OR ( United States ).
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2011 Apr;9(2):106-9. doi: 10.4321/s1886-36552011000200008. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
Frequent, suboptimal use of antimicrobial drugs has resulted in the emergence of microbial resistance, compromised clinical outcomes and increased costs, particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU). Mounting on these challenges is the paucity of new antimicrobial agents.
The study aims to determine the impact of prospective pharmacy-driven antimicrobial stewardship in the ICU on clinical and potential financial outcomes. The primary objectives were to determine the mean length of stay (LOS) and mortality rate in the ICU resulting from prospective pharmacy interventions on antimicrobial therapy. The secondary objective was to calculate the difference in total drug acquisition costs resulting from pharmacy infectious diseases (ID)-related interventions.
In collaboration with an infectious disease physician, the ICU pharmacy team provided prospective audit with feedback to physicians on antimicrobial therapies of 70 patients over a 4-month period in a 31-bed ICU. In comparison with published data, LOS and mortality of pharmacy-monitored ICU patients were recorded. Daily cost savings on antimicrobial drugs and charges for medication therapy management (MTM) services were added to calculate potential total cost savings. Pharmacy interventions focused on streamlining, dose optimization, intravenous-to-oral conversion, antimicrobial discontinuation, new recommendation and drug information consult. Antimicrobial education was featured in oral presentations and electronic newsletters for pharmacists and clinicians.
The mean LOS in the ICU was 6 days, which was lower than the published reports of LOS ranging from 11 to 36 days. The morality rate of 14% was comparable to the reported range of 6 to 20% in published literature. The total drug cost difference was a negative financial outcome or loss of USD192 associated with ID-related interventions.
In collaboration with the infectious disease physician, prospective pharmacy intervention on antimicrobial therapy in the ICU led to positive clinical outcomes and an additional drug cost expense of USD192.
抗菌药物的频繁、不合理使用导致了微生物耐药性的出现、临床疗效受损以及成本增加,在重症监护病房(ICU)尤为如此。在这些挑战之上,新抗菌药物的匮乏也日益凸显。
本研究旨在确定ICU中由药学主导的前瞻性抗菌药物管理对临床和潜在财务结果的影响。主要目标是确定前瞻性药学干预抗菌治疗后ICU的平均住院时间(LOS)和死亡率。次要目标是计算药学传染病(ID)相关干预导致的药品采购总成本差异。
ICU药学团队与一名传染病医生合作,在一个拥有31张床位的ICU中,对70例患者在4个月期间的抗菌治疗进行前瞻性审核,并向医生提供反馈。与已发表的数据相比,记录药学监测的ICU患者的LOS和死亡率。将抗菌药物的每日成本节省和药物治疗管理(MTM)服务费用相加,以计算潜在的总成本节省。药学干预集中在简化用药、剂量优化、静脉给药改为口服给药、停用抗菌药物、新建议和药物信息咨询。通过口头报告和电子通讯向药剂师和临床医生提供抗菌药物教育。
ICU的平均LOS为6天,低于已发表报告中11至36天的LOS范围。14%的死亡率与已发表文献中报告的6%至20%的范围相当。与ID相关干预相关的药品总成本差异为负财务结果或192美元的损失。
与传染病医生合作,ICU中对抗菌治疗的前瞻性药学干预带来了积极的临床结果,但药品成本额外增加了192美元。