Sakaue Shinji, Kamigaki Mitsunori, Yoshimura Haruhiko, Nishimura Masaharu
First Department of Medicine, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Department of Internal Medicine, Iwamizawa Municipal General Hospital, Iwamizawa, Japan.
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2008 Aug;69(4):364-77. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2008.08.005.
Insulin resistance is a critical aspect of the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and is also associated with other risk factors for cardiovascular disease (eg, dyslipidemia and hypertension). Accordingly, insulin resistance is a possible target for lowering plasma glucose concentration and preventing diabetic macroangiopathy. Biguanides, such as metformin, and thiazolidinediones (TZDs), such as pioglitazone, improve insulin resistance.
The aims of this study were to assess the effects of replacing a biguanide with a TZD on glycemic control in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus, and also to identify the factors affecting interpatient variation in the effects of treatment change.
This was a 12-week, open-label, prospective study in which previously prescribed metformin (500 or 750 mg/d) was replaced with pioglitazone (15 or 30 mg/d) in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients with a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration >7% despite treatment with diet, exercise, and hypoglycemic agents other than TZDs were eligible for the study. Patients who never received TZDs were also eligible for inclusion. Vital signs, metabolic parameters, and arterial stiffness were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment with pioglitazone. The primary end point was change in HbA1c concentration after replacing metformin with pioglitazone. Tolerability was assessed by medical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase).
Twenty-one Japanese patients (15 women, 6 men; mean [SD] age, 61.8 [8.4] years; body mass index, 25.5 [3.0] kg/m(2)) were included in the study. HbA1c concentration was not significantly changed from baseline after 12 weeks of pioglitazone treatment (8.0% [0.7%] vs 8.2% [0.7%]). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) concentration also was not significantly changed after the replacement of treatment (156 [27] vs 144 [30] mg/dL). In addition, the resistin concentration did not change significantly from baseline after 12 weeks of pioglitazone treatment (6.6 [3.8] vs 6.4 [3.6] ng/mL). In contrast, significant improvement from baseline was observed in triglyceride (TG) concentrations (157 [109] vs 117 [68] mg/dL; P = 0.003), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (55 [12] vs 61 [16] mg/dL; P = 0.016), remnant-like particle cholesterol (6.6 [6.0] vs 5.3 [3.5] mg/dL; P = 0.048), and serum adiponectin (8.8 [4.3] vs 23.3 [11.7] μg/mL; P < 0.001). Pulse wave velocity was also significantly improved (1730 [361] vs 1622 [339] m/sec; P = 0.009). Changes in HbA1c were significantly correlated with serum fasting insulin concentration at baseline in the patients not receiving insulin preparations (r = -0.635, P = 0.013). The percentage change in serum adiponectin concentration was correlated with the percentage changes in HbA1c and FPG concentrations (HbA1c, r = -0.518, P = 0.019; FPG, r = -0.594, P = 0.006). Body weight was significantly increased after treatment (62.6 [11.9] vs 65.5 [12.2] kg; P < 0.001). Mild edema was reported in 5 patients. One patient discontinued treatment due to an increase in serum creatine kinase activity to ~6.6 times the upper limit of normal.
Replacement of metformin with pioglitazone did not produce significant differences in HbA1c and FPG concentrations from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment in these patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the replacement was effective in a subset of patients whose serum insulin concentrations were high or whose serum adiponectin concentrations were sensitive to TZDs. In addition, the replacement was associated with significant improvements in TG, HDL-C, serum adiponectin concentration, pulse wave velocity, and body weight increase from baseline.
胰岛素抵抗是2型糖尿病病理生理学的一个关键方面,并且还与心血管疾病的其他危险因素(如血脂异常和高血压)相关。因此,胰岛素抵抗是降低血糖浓度和预防糖尿病大血管病变的一个可能靶点。双胍类药物(如二甲双胍)和噻唑烷二酮类药物(TZDs,如吡格列酮)可改善胰岛素抵抗。
本研究旨在评估用噻唑烷二酮类药物替代双胍类药物对2型糖尿病控制不佳患者血糖控制的影响,并确定影响治疗改变效果的患者间差异的因素。
这是一项为期12周的开放标签前瞻性研究,将之前服用二甲双胍(500或750mg/d)的2型糖尿病控制不佳患者换用吡格列酮(15或30mg/d)。尽管接受饮食、运动和非噻唑烷二酮类降糖药物治疗,但糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)浓度>7%的患者符合研究条件。从未接受过噻唑烷二酮类药物治疗的患者也符合纳入标准。在基线和吡格列酮治疗12周后评估生命体征、代谢参数和动脉僵硬度。主要终点是用吡格列酮替代二甲双胍后HbA1c浓度的变化。通过病史、体格检查和实验室检查(天冬氨酸转氨酶、丙氨酸转氨酶和γ-谷氨酰转肽酶)评估耐受性。
21名日本患者(15名女性,6名男性;平均[标准差]年龄,61.8[8.4]岁;体重指数,25.5[3.0]kg/m²)纳入研究。吡格列酮治疗12周后,HbA1c浓度与基线相比无显著变化(8.0%[0.7%]对8.2%[0.7%])。更换治疗后空腹血糖(FPG)浓度也无显著变化(156[27]对144[30]mg/dL)。此外,吡格列酮治疗12周后抵抗素浓度与基线相比无显著变化(6.6[3.8]对6.4[3.6]ng/mL)。相比之下,甘油三酯(TG)浓度(157[109]对117[68]mg/dL;P = 0.003)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)(55[12]对61[16]mg/dL;P = 0.016)、残粒样颗粒胆固醇(6.6[6.0]对5.3[3.5]mg/dL;P = 0.048)和血清脂联素(8.8[4.3]对23.3[11.7]μg/mL;P < 0.001)与基线相比有显著改善。脉搏波速度也显著改善(1730[361]对1622[339]m/秒;P = 0.009)。在未接受胰岛素制剂的患者中,HbA1c的变化与基线时血清空腹胰岛素浓度显著相关(r = -0.635,P = 0.013)。血清脂联素浓度的百分比变化与HbA1c和FPG浓度的百分比变化相关(HbA1c,r = -0.518,P = 0.019;FPG,r = -0.594,P = 0.006)。治疗后体重显著增加(62.6[11.9]对65.5[12.2]kg;P < 0.001)。5名患者报告有轻度水肿。1名患者因血清肌酸激酶活性增加至正常上限的约6.6倍而停药。
在这些2型糖尿病控制不佳的患者中,用吡格列酮替代二甲双胍治疗12周后,HbA1c和FPG浓度与基线相比无显著差异。然而,对于血清胰岛素浓度高或血清脂联素浓度对噻唑烷二酮类药物敏感的部分患者,这种替代是有效的。此外,这种替代与TG、HDL-C、血清脂联素浓度、脉搏波速度显著改善以及体重较基线增加相关。