Suppr超能文献

拉丁美洲的科学期刊是否遵循两用审查政策?

Do Latin American scientific journals follow dual-use review policies?

作者信息

Valles Edith Gladys, Bernacchi Adriana Silvina

机构信息

Edith Galdys Valles, DVM, PhD, and Adriana Silvina Bernacchi, PhD, are Technical Advisors, Scientific and Technical Research Institute for Defense , Buenos Aires, Argentina .

出版信息

Biosecur Bioterror. 2014 Mar-Apr;12(2):94-105. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2013.0088. Epub 2014 Apr 2.

Abstract

During the past decade, a number of journals have implemented dual-use policies in order to analyze whether the papers submitted for publication could raise concern because of the potential for misuse of their content. In this context, an analysis was performed on Latin American scientific journals to examine whether they apply formal written dual-use review policies and whether they inform their authors and reviewers about potentially sensitive issues in this area, as other international journals do. Peer-reviewed life sciences journals indexed in Latindex from Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, and Chile were analyzed. The Guide for Authors and the Instructions to Referees of 216 journals included in the Latindex catalogue (which means that they meet the best quality standards of the Latindex system) were screened for biosecurity-related information using the keywords biosecurity, biological weapons, and dual-use research of concern. Results showed that the screened publications had a total lack of dual-use review policies, even though some of them pointed out ethical behaviors to be followed related to authorship, plagiarism, simultaneous submission, research results misappropriation, ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, guiding principles for the care and use of animals in research, research standard violations, and reviewer bias, among others.

摘要

在过去十年中,一些期刊实施了两用政策,以分析提交发表的论文是否因其内容可能被滥用而引发担忧。在此背景下,对拉丁美洲的科学期刊进行了一项分析,以研究它们是否采用正式的书面两用审查政策,以及是否像其他国际期刊那样,就该领域潜在的敏感问题通知其作者和审稿人。分析了巴西、墨西哥、阿根廷和智利在Latindex中索引的同行评审生命科学期刊。使用关键词“生物安全”“生物武器”和“两用关注研究”,对Latindex目录中收录的216种期刊(这意味着它们符合Latindex系统的最佳质量标准)的作者指南和审稿人须知进行了生物安全相关信息筛查。结果表明,尽管其中一些期刊指出了在作者身份、抄袭、同时投稿、研究成果挪用、涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则、研究中动物护理和使用的指导原则、违反研究标准以及审稿人偏见等方面应遵循的道德行为,但所筛查的出版物完全缺乏两用审查政策。

相似文献

1
Do Latin American scientific journals follow dual-use review policies?
Biosecur Bioterror. 2014 Mar-Apr;12(2):94-105. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2013.0088. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
2
[Toward a model of communications in public health in Latin America and the Caribbean].
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2005 Dec;18(6):427-38. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892005001000006.
3
Biosecurity and the review and publication of dual-use research of concern.
Biosecur Bioterror. 2012 Sep;10(3):290-8. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0011. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
4
Dual-use review policies of biomedical research journals.
Biosecur Bioterror. 2011 Mar;9(1):49-54. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2010.0067.
5
[Editorial situation of seven Latin American journals on respiratory diseases].
Rev Med Chil. 2007 Aug;135(8):1072-5. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872007000800017. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
6
Biosecurity policies at international life science journals.
Biosecur Bioterror. 2009 Mar;7(1):61-71. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2008.0027.
7
Authorship policies of scientific journals.
J Med Ethics. 2016 Mar;42(3):199-202. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103171. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
8
Teaching authorship and publication practices in the biomedical and life sciences.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Jun;17(2):341-54. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9275-1. Epub 2011 May 1.
9
Authors submission guidelines, a survey of pediatric dentistry journals regarding ethical issues.
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 19;17(1):e0261881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261881. eCollection 2022.
10
Challenges in peer review: how to guarantee the quality and transparency of the editorial process in scientific journals.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2023 Jul;99(1):54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.anpede.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Awareness of the dual-use dilemma in scientific research: reflections and challenges to Latin America.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Jul 28;13:1649781. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1649781. eCollection 2025.
2
Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017.
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 5;12(1):5840. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26027-y.
3
Why has Not There been More Research of Concern?
Front Public Health. 2014 Jul 22;2:74. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00074. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

2
A novel strain of Clostridium botulinum that produces type B and type H botulinum toxins.
J Infect Dis. 2014 Jan 15;209(2):183-91. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit449. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
3
Airborne transmission of influenza A/H5N1 virus between ferrets.
Science. 2012 Jun 22;336(6088):1534-41. doi: 10.1126/science.1213362.
5
Dual-use review policies of biomedical research journals.
Biosecur Bioterror. 2011 Mar;9(1):49-54. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2010.0067.
6
The biological century: coming to terms with risk in the life sciences.
Nat Immunol. 2010 Apr;11(4):275-8. doi: 10.1038/ni0410-275.
7
Biosecurity policies at international life science journals.
Biosecur Bioterror. 2009 Mar;7(1):61-71. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2008.0027.
8
Characterization of the 1918 influenza virus polymerase genes.
Nature. 2005 Oct 6;437(7060):889-93. doi: 10.1038/nature04230.
9
Analyzing a bioterror attack on the food supply: the case of botulinum toxin in milk.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 12;102(28):9984-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408526102. Epub 2005 Jun 28.
10
Statement on the consideration of biodefence and biosecurity.
Nature. 2003 Feb 20;421(6925):771. doi: 10.1038/nature01479. Epub 2003 Feb 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验