Valles Edith Gladys, Bernacchi Adriana Silvina
Edith Galdys Valles, DVM, PhD, and Adriana Silvina Bernacchi, PhD, are Technical Advisors, Scientific and Technical Research Institute for Defense , Buenos Aires, Argentina .
Biosecur Bioterror. 2014 Mar-Apr;12(2):94-105. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2013.0088. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
During the past decade, a number of journals have implemented dual-use policies in order to analyze whether the papers submitted for publication could raise concern because of the potential for misuse of their content. In this context, an analysis was performed on Latin American scientific journals to examine whether they apply formal written dual-use review policies and whether they inform their authors and reviewers about potentially sensitive issues in this area, as other international journals do. Peer-reviewed life sciences journals indexed in Latindex from Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, and Chile were analyzed. The Guide for Authors and the Instructions to Referees of 216 journals included in the Latindex catalogue (which means that they meet the best quality standards of the Latindex system) were screened for biosecurity-related information using the keywords biosecurity, biological weapons, and dual-use research of concern. Results showed that the screened publications had a total lack of dual-use review policies, even though some of them pointed out ethical behaviors to be followed related to authorship, plagiarism, simultaneous submission, research results misappropriation, ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, guiding principles for the care and use of animals in research, research standard violations, and reviewer bias, among others.
在过去十年中,一些期刊实施了两用政策,以分析提交发表的论文是否因其内容可能被滥用而引发担忧。在此背景下,对拉丁美洲的科学期刊进行了一项分析,以研究它们是否采用正式的书面两用审查政策,以及是否像其他国际期刊那样,就该领域潜在的敏感问题通知其作者和审稿人。分析了巴西、墨西哥、阿根廷和智利在Latindex中索引的同行评审生命科学期刊。使用关键词“生物安全”“生物武器”和“两用关注研究”,对Latindex目录中收录的216种期刊(这意味着它们符合Latindex系统的最佳质量标准)的作者指南和审稿人须知进行了生物安全相关信息筛查。结果表明,尽管其中一些期刊指出了在作者身份、抄袭、同时投稿、研究成果挪用、涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则、研究中动物护理和使用的指导原则、违反研究标准以及审稿人偏见等方面应遵循的道德行为,但所筛查的出版物完全缺乏两用审查政策。