• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院青少年优质医疗保健的测量框架。

A measurement framework for quality health care for adolescents in hospital.

作者信息

Sawyer Susan M, Ambresin Anne-Emmanuelle, Bennett Kristina E, Patton George C

机构信息

Royal Children's Hospital Centre for Adolescent Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

Royal Children's Hospital Centre for Adolescent Health, Melbourne, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Adolesc Health. 2014 Oct;55(4):484-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.01.023. Epub 2014 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.01.023
PMID:24698286
Abstract

PURPOSE

Despite growing interest in measurement of health care quality and patient experience, the current evidence base largely derives from adult health settings, at least in part because of the absence of appropriately developed measurement tools for adolescents. To rectify this, we set out to develop a conceptual framework and a set of indicators to measure the quality of health care delivered to adolescents in hospital.

METHODS

A conceptual framework was developed from the following four elements: (1) a review of the evidence around what young people perceive as "adolescent-friendly" health care; (2) an exploration with adolescent patients of the principles of patient-centered care; (3) a scoping review to identify core clinical practices around working with adolescents; and (4) a scoping review of existing conceptual frameworks. Using criteria for indicator development, we then developed a set of indicators that mapped to this framework.

RESULTS

Embedded within the notion of patient- and family-centered care, the conceptual framework for adolescent-friendly health care (quality health care for adolescents) was based on the constructs of experience of care (positive engagement with health care) and evidence-informed care. A set of 14 indicators was developed, half of which related to adolescents' and parents' experience of care and half of which related to aspects of evidence-informed care.

CONCLUSIONS

The conceptual framework and indicators of quality health care for adolescents set the stage to develop measures to populate these indicators, the next step in the agenda of improving the quality of health care delivered to adolescents in hospital settings.

摘要

目的

尽管对医疗质量和患者体验测量的兴趣日益浓厚,但目前的证据基础主要来自成人健康环境,至少部分原因是缺乏专门为青少年开发的测量工具。为纠正这一情况,我们着手制定一个概念框架和一套指标,以衡量医院为青少年提供的医疗服务质量。

方法

从以下四个要素构建了一个概念框架:(1)对年轻人所认为的“青少年友好型”医疗服务相关证据进行回顾;(2)与青少年患者探讨以患者为中心的护理原则;(3)进行范围审查以确定围绕青少年工作的核心临床实践;(4)对现有概念框架进行范围审查。然后,我们根据指标制定标准,开发了一套与该框架相对应的指标。

结果

以患者和家庭为中心的护理理念为基础,青少年友好型医疗服务(青少年优质医疗服务)的概念框架基于护理体验(与医疗服务的积极互动)和循证护理的构建。共制定了14项指标,其中一半与青少年及其父母的护理体验相关,另一半与循证护理的各个方面相关。

结论

青少年优质医疗服务的概念框架和指标为开发填充这些指标的测量方法奠定了基础,这是提高医院为青少年提供的医疗服务质量议程的下一步。

相似文献

1
A measurement framework for quality health care for adolescents in hospital.医院青少年优质医疗保健的测量框架。
J Adolesc Health. 2014 Oct;55(4):484-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.01.023. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
2
Assessing the quality of healthcare provided to children.评估为儿童提供的医疗保健质量。
Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct;33(4 Pt 2):1059-90.
3
Review of quality measures of the most integrated health care settings for children and the need for improved measures: recommendations for initial core measurement set for CHIPRA.儿童最综合医疗保健环境的质量指标回顾及对改进措施的需求:《儿童健康保险计划》初始核心衡量标准的建议。
Acad Pediatr. 2011 May-Jun;11(3 Suppl):S49-S58.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2011.02.006.
4
Development of generic quality indicators for patient-centered cancer care by using a RAND modified Delphi method.采用 RAND 改良 Delphi 法制定以患者为中心的癌症护理通用质量指标。
Cancer Nurs. 2012 Jan-Feb;35(1):29-37. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e318210e3a2.
5
Postacute rehabilitation quality of care: toward a shared conceptual framework.急性后期康复护理质量:构建共享概念框架
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;96(5):960-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.007. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
6
Development of guideline-based indicators for patient-centredness in fertility care: what patients add.基于指南的生育关怀以患者为中心的指标制定:患者的补充内容。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Apr;28(4):987-96. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det010. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
7
Measuring the quality of hospital care: an inventory of indicators.测量医院护理质量:指标目录。
Intern Med J. 2009 Jun;39(6):352-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.01961.x. Epub 2009 Mar 23.
8
Promising Practices for Achieving Patient-centered Hospital Care: A National Study of High-performing US Hospitals.实现以患者为中心的医院护理的成功实践:对美国高绩效医院的全国性研究。
Med Care. 2015 Sep;53(9):758-67. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000396.
9
Improving methods for measuring quality of care: a patient-centered approach in chronic disease.改善医疗质量测量方法:慢性病中以患者为中心的方法。
Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Apr;66(2):147-66. doi: 10.1177/1077558708327174. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
10
Can we decide which outcomes should be measured in every clinical trial? A scoping review of the existing conceptual frameworks and processes to develop core outcome sets.我们能否确定在每项临床试验中应测量哪些结果?对用于制定核心结局集的现有概念框架和流程的范围综述。
J Rheumatol. 2014 May;41(5):986-93. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.131308. Epub 2014 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Adolescent and Caregiver preparation for legal changes at age 18.青少年及其照顾者为18岁时的法律变更所做的准备。
Health Care Transit. 2025 Jun 12;3:100106. doi: 10.1016/j.hctj.2025.100106. eCollection 2025.
2
Anxiety and care experiences in adolescents with chronic health conditions: an international, longitudinal study across the transfer of care.青少年慢性健康状况的焦虑和护理体验:跨越护理交接的国际纵向研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Nov 19;8(1):e002836. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002836.
3
Experience of Service Questionnaire (ESQ) in children and adolescents: factor structure, reliability, validity, item parameters and interpretability of the parent version for practical use in Greece.
儿童和青少年服务体验问卷(ESQ):家长版在希腊实际应用中的因子结构、信度、效度、项目参数和可解释性。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Nov 8;8(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00798-6.
4
Experience of Service Questionnaire (ESQ) in children and adolescents: factor structure, reliability, validity, item parameters and interpretability of the parent version for practical use in Greece.儿童和青少年服务问卷(ESQ)在希腊的应用经验:家长版的因子结构、信度、效度、项目参数及实际应用中的可解释性
medRxiv. 2024 Jul 5:2024.07.05.24309986. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.05.24309986.
5
Satisfaction with in-patient child and adolescent psychiatric treatment: development and psychometric properties of the BEST questionnaires for adolescents and for parents.住院儿童及青少年精神科治疗满意度:青少年版及家长版BEST问卷的编制与心理测量学特性
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2021 Sep 4;15(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13034-021-00395-1.
6
Bridge study protocol: an international, observational cohort study on the transition of healthcare for adolescents with chronic conditions.桥梁研究方案:一项关于慢性病青少年医疗保健过渡的国际观察性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 21;11(6):e048340. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048340.
7
Evaluating quality in adolescent mental health services: a systematic review.评估青少年心理健康服务的质量:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 10;11(5):e044929. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044929.
8
The Adolescent Patient Experiences of Diabetes Care Questionnaire (APEQ-DC): Reliability and Validity in a Study Based on Data from the Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry.青少年糖尿病护理问卷患者体验(APEQ-DC):基于挪威儿童糖尿病登记处数据的一项研究中的信度和效度
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019 Dec 27;10:405-416. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S232166. eCollection 2019.
9
Associations between adolescent experiences, parent experiences and HbA1c: results following two surveys based on the Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry (NCDR).青少年经历、父母经历与糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)之间的关联:基于挪威儿童糖尿病登记处(NCDR)的两项调查结果
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 2;9(11):e032201. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032201.
10
Can we normalise developmentally appropriate health care for young people in UK hospital settings? An ethnographic study.我们能否使英国医院环境中针对年轻人的适合其发育阶段的医疗保健常态化?一项人种志研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 9;9(9):e029107. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029107.