Suppr超能文献

阴道液中胎盘α微球蛋白-1与羊膜腔内注射靛胭脂用于胎膜破裂诊断的比较

Comparison of placental alpha microglobulin-1 in vaginal fluid with intra-amniotic injection of indigo carmine for the diagnosis of rupture of membranes.

作者信息

Sosa Claudio G, Herrera Edward, Restrepo Juan C, Strauss Alexander, Alonso Justo

出版信息

J Perinat Med. 2014 Sep;42(5):611-6. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0245.

Abstract

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of an immunoassay for placental alpha microglobulin-1 (PAMG-1) in vaginal fluid with the intra-amniotic instillation of indigo carmine for the diagnosis of membrane rupture in patients with an equivocal status.

METHODS

A prospective multi-site study was performed involving women reporting signs, symptoms, or complaints suggestive of rupture of membrane (ROM) between 21 and 42 weeks of gestation without obvious leakage of fluid from the cervical os during sterile speculum examination and without confirmation of ROM by traditional methods.

RESULTS

A total of 140 patients were recruited with a prevalence of ROM of 19.3%. The PAMG-1 test had a sensitivity of 100.0% [confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.0], specificity of 99.1% [(CI) 0.95-0.99], positive predictive value of 96.3% [(CI) 0.82-0.99], negative predictive value of 100.0% [(CI) 0.97-1.0], and ± likelihood ratios of 74.6 [(CI) 20.31-274.51] and 0.0 [(CI) 0.00-0.98].

CONCLUSIONS

The PAMG-1 immunoassay in vaginal fluid yielded results that were comparable to those of the instillation of indigo carmine into the amniotic cavity; therefore, we propose that PAMG-1 is a sensitive and specific test to assess ROM in patients with an equivocal diagnosis based on simple tests. This finding prompts consideration for the use of the noninvasive PAMG-1 test in situations where the use of the invasive dye test is not practical.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较阴道液中胎盘α微球蛋白-1(PAMG-1)免疫测定法与羊膜腔内注入靛胭脂用于诊断胎膜破裂情况不明确患者胎膜破裂的诊断性能。

方法

进行了一项前瞻性多中心研究,纳入妊娠21至42周报告有提示胎膜破裂(ROM)的体征、症状或主诉的妇女,在无菌阴道窥器检查时宫颈口无明显液体渗漏且未通过传统方法确诊ROM。

结果

共招募了140例患者,ROM患病率为19.3%。PAMG-1检测的敏感性为100.0%[置信区间(CI)0.87 - 1.0],特异性为99.1%[(CI)0.95 - 0.99],阳性预测值为96.3%[(CI)0.82 - 0.99],阴性预测值为100.0%[(CI)0.97 - 1.0],阳性似然比为74.6[(CI)20.31 - 274.51],阴性似然比为0.0[(CI)0.00 - 0.98]。

结论

阴道液中PAMG-1免疫测定法的结果与羊膜腔内注入靛胭脂的结果相当;因此,我们建议PAMG-1是一种敏感且特异的检测方法,可用于基于简单检查诊断不明确的患者评估ROM。这一发现促使人们考虑在侵入性染料试验不实用的情况下使用非侵入性PAMG-1检测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验