Perino Alexander C, Singh Nikhil, Aggarwal Sonya, Froelicher Victor
Stanford University School of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, United States.
University at Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, United States.
Int J Cardiol. 2014 May 15;173(3):494-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.03.091. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
The third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (UDMI) includes electrocardiographic criteria for ischemia, specifying horizontal or down-sloping ST depression ≥0.05 mV in two contiguous electrocardiogram (ECG) leads. We used the surrogate of cardiovascular (CV) death to evaluate the criteria.
We collected computerized ST amplitude measurements, in different lead groupings, from the resting ECGs of 43,661 patients collected between 1987 and 1999 at the Palo Alto VA. There were 3929 (9.0%) cardiac deaths over a mean follow-up of 7.6 (SD 3.8) years.
We found that horizontal or down-sloping ST depressions in contiguous leads, depending upon the lead groupings, had sensitivities ranging from 1% to 5%, specificities exceeding 99%, and relative risks for CV death ranging from 3.1 to 7.0 (p<0.001 for each individual relative risk) while horizontal or down-sloping ST depressions in a single lead had comparable values. We found that up-sloping ST depressions had greater sensitivities than horizontal or down-sloping ST depressions. Additionally, we found that ST depressions isolated to the inferior or anterior leads, without concomitant lateral depressions, were poor predictors of CV death.
These findings reinforce and further characterize the value of ST depressions for predicting CV death. Furthermore, if these findings can be reproduced in the acute setting, they would undermine the requirement for contiguous lead depressions with slope assessment as well as prioritize ST depression in V4, V5, and V6 when assessing for myocardial ischemia.
第三次心肌梗死通用定义(UDMI)纳入了缺血的心电图标准,具体为两个相邻心电图(ECG)导联中水平或下斜型ST段压低≥0.05 mV。我们使用心血管(CV)死亡替代指标来评估该标准。
我们收集了1987年至1999年期间在帕洛阿尔托退伍军人管理局收集的43661例患者静息心电图在不同导联分组中的计算机化ST段振幅测量值。在平均7.6(标准差3.8)年的随访期间,有3929例(9.0%)心脏死亡病例。
我们发现,相邻导联的水平或下斜型ST段压低,根据导联分组不同,敏感性范围为1%至5%,特异性超过99%,CV死亡的相对风险范围为3.1至7.0(每个个体相对风险p<0.001),而单个导联的水平或下斜型ST段压低具有类似的值。我们发现上斜型ST段压低比水平或下斜型ST段压低具有更高的敏感性。此外,我们发现局限于下壁或前壁导联的ST段压低,无伴随侧壁压低,对CV死亡的预测能力较差。
这些发现强化并进一步描述了ST段压低对预测CV死亡的价值。此外,如果这些发现在急性情况下能够重现,它们将削弱对相邻导联压低及斜率评估的要求,并且在评估心肌缺血时将V4、V5和V6导联的ST段压低列为优先考虑因素。