Ploog Bertram O
College of Staten Island, City University of New York, United States; Graduate School and University Center, City University of New York, United States.
Behav Processes. 2014 Jul;106:5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
Four pigeons and eight chickens received autoshaping training where a keylight (conditioned stimulus) signaled response-independent deliveries of water (unconditioned stimulus). Pigeons drink while keeping their beaks submerged in water and moving their beaks to create suction ("mumbling"), whereas chickens drink by trapping a small amount of water in their mouths and then lifting their heads so the water trickles down. This experiment tested whether these and other species-specific differences in drinking and related behaviors of pigeons and chickens would be reflected in the form of conditioned (autoshaped) responding. Touchscreens and videotapes were used for data recording. Results showed that chickens moved their heads more than pigeons when drinking (unconditioned response). The birds also differed in conditioned responding in the presence of the keylight: Pigeons produced more keyswitch closures and mumbled at the keylight more than chickens whereas chickens scratched more than pigeons. In conclusion, with this unique comparative method that employed identical contingencies and comparable deprivation levels, species-specific differences in unconditioned responses and, more importantly, differences in their corresponding conditioned responses were observed.
四只鸽子和八只鸡接受了自动成型训练,在训练中,一个按键灯(条件刺激)预示着与反应无关的水(非条件刺激)的递送。鸽子喝水时会将喙浸入水中并移动喙以产生吸力(“咕噜声”),而鸡喝水时会在嘴里截留少量水,然后抬起头让水涓涓流下。本实验测试了鸽子和鸡在饮水及相关行为方面的这些以及其他物种特异性差异是否会以条件性(自动成型)反应的形式体现出来。使用触摸屏和录像带进行数据记录。结果表明,鸡在饮水(非条件反应)时比鸽子更多地移动头部。在按键灯出现时,这些鸟在条件反应方面也存在差异:鸽子比鸡产生更多的按键闭合,并且在按键灯出现时发出更多的咕噜声,而鸡比鸽子更多地抓挠。总之,通过这种采用相同意外情况和可比剥夺水平的独特比较方法,观察到了非条件反应中的物种特异性差异,更重要的是,观察到了它们相应条件反应中的差异。