Duchman Kyle R, Lynch Charles F, Buckwalter Joseph A, Miller Benjamin J
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, 01015 JPP, Iowa City, IA, 52246, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Aug;472(8):2516-25. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3600-3. Epub 2014 Apr 5.
Conditional survival measures change in the risk of mortality given that a patient has survived a defined period of time. This has yet to be reported for chondrosarcoma of bone. This information should be of interest to the clinician and helpful in counseling patients with chondrosarcoma.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Our questions include the following: (1) Does the conditional survival of patients with local/regional chondrosarcoma improve with each additional year of survival? (2) Does the conditional survival of patients with metastatic chondrosarcoma improve with each additional year of survival? (3) Does tumor location, use of radiation, or patient age affect conditional survival? (4) Can chondrosarcoma ever be considered cured?
We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database maintained by the National Cancer Institute to identify 2138 patients with chondrosarcoma of bone from 1973 to 2009. We used an actuarial life table analysis to explore differences in 5-year cause-specific survival estimates conditional on 1 to 5 years of survival. The cohort was stratified by grade, location (axial versus extremity), use of radiation, and age. Finally, we expanded the analysis to include survival estimates 20 years after diagnosis conditional on survival for 5 and 10 years.
The estimated survival for all grades of local/regional chondrosarcoma improved from baseline with each year of survival after diagnosis. At 5 years after diagnosis, local/regional Grade 1 chondrosarcoma displayed higher conditional survival than Grade 2 and 3 local/regional chondrosarcoma (97.2% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 95.2%-98.4%] versus 92.8% [95% CI, 89.5%-95.0%], p = 0.006 and 83.8% [95% CI, 69.9%-91.7%], p = 0.012). Estimated survival improved from baseline with each year of survival for all grades of metastatic chondrosarcoma. Conditional survival estimates for Grade 3 axial tumors failed to improve from baseline to 5 years after diagnosis (52.9% versus 70.2%, p > 0.05) compared with Grade 3 extremity tumors at baseline and 5 years after diagnosis (58.1% versus 95.8%, p < 0.0001) The 20-year conditional survival estimates reveal that a cancer-specific risk of mortality exists even 10 years after diagnosis, suggesting that although the conditional survival increases considerably over time, it cannot be considered cured.
The 5-year conditional survival estimate for patients with chondrosarcoma improved with each additional year of survival regardless of grade, site, age, or use of radiation. At 10 years after diagnosis, deaths attributable to cancer were still present, and patients should be aware of this small long-term risk.
Level II, prognostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
条件生存用于衡量在患者已存活特定时间段的情况下死亡风险的变化。骨肉瘤的这一情况尚未见报道。该信息对于临床医生应是有意义的,并且有助于为骨肉瘤患者提供咨询。
问题/目的:我们的问题如下:(1)局部/区域骨肉瘤患者的条件生存是否会随着生存时间每增加一年而改善?(2)转移性骨肉瘤患者的条件生存是否会随着生存时间每增加一年而改善?(3)肿瘤位置、放疗的使用或患者年龄是否会影响条件生存?(4)骨肉瘤能否被认为已治愈?
我们使用了美国国家癌症研究所维护的监测、流行病学和最终结果计划数据库,以识别1973年至2009年期间的2138例骨肉瘤患者。我们使用精算生命表分析来探讨在存活1至5年的条件下5年特定病因生存估计的差异。队列按分级、位置(轴向与四肢)、放疗的使用和年龄进行分层。最后,我们将分析扩展至包括诊断后20年的生存估计,条件是已存活5年和10年。
所有分级的局部/区域骨肉瘤的估计生存从诊断后的基线水平开始,随着生存时间每增加一年而改善。诊断后5年时,局部/区域1级骨肉瘤的条件生存高于2级和3级局部/区域骨肉瘤(97.2% [95%置信区间{CI},95.2%-98.4%] 对 92.8% [95% CI,89.5%-95.0%],p = 0.006 和 83.8% [95% CI,69.9%-91.7%],p = 0.012)。所有分级的转移性骨肉瘤的估计生存从基线水平开始,随着生存时间每增加一年而改善。与诊断后5年时的3级四肢肿瘤(58.1% 对 95.8%,p < 0.0001)相比,3级轴向肿瘤从基线到诊断后5年的条件生存估计未从基线水平改善(52.9% 对 70.2%,p > 0.05)。20年条件生存估计显示,即使在诊断后10年仍存在癌症特异性死亡风险,这表明尽管条件生存随时间显著增加,但不能认为已治愈。
骨肉瘤患者的5年条件生存估计随着生存时间每增加一年而改善,无论分级、部位、年龄或放疗的使用情况如何。诊断后10年时,仍存在癌症导致的死亡,患者应知晓这一较小的长期风险。
II级,预后研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者须知。