Li Mei, Zhou Luming, Palais Robert A, Wittwer Carl T
Department of Pathology, University of Utah Medical School, Salt Lake City, UT; current address: Laboratory Center, the Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China;
Department of Pathology, University of Utah Medical School, Salt Lake City, UT;
Clin Chem. 2014 Jun;60(6):864-72. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.220160. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
High-resolution DNA melting is a closed-tube method for genotyping and variant scanning that depends on the thermal stability of PCR-generated products. Instruments vary in thermal precision, sample format, melting rates, acquisition, and software. Instrument genotyping accuracy has not been assessed.
Each genotype of the single nucleotide variant (SNV) (c.3405-29A>T) of CPS1 (carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial) was amplified by PCR in the presence of LCGreen Plus with 4 PCR product lengths. After blinding and genotype randomization, samples were melted in 10 instrument configurations under conditions recommended by the manufacturer. For each configuration and PCR product length, we analyzed 32-96 samples (depending on batch size) with both commercial and custom software. We assessed the accuracy of heterozygote detection and homozygote differentiation of a difficult, nearest-neighbor symmetric, class 4 variant with predicted ΔT(m) of 0.00 °C.
Overall, the heterozygote accuracy was 99.7% (n = 2141), whereas homozygote accuracy was 70.3% (n = 4441). Instruments with single sample detection as opposed to full-plate imaging better distinguished homozygotes (78.1% and 61.8%, respectively, χ(2) P < 0.0005). Custom software improved accuracy over commercial software (P < 0.002), although melting protocols recommended by manufacturers were better than a constant ramp rate of 0.1 °C with an oil overlay. PCR products of 51, 100, 272, and 547 bp had accuracies of 72.3%, 83.1%, 59.8%, and 65.9%, respectively (P < 0.0005).
High-resolution melting detects heterozygotes with excellent accuracy, but homozygote accuracy is dependent on detection mode, analysis software, and PCR product size, as well as melting temperature differences between, and variation within, homozygotes.
高分辨率DNA熔解是一种用于基因分型和变异扫描的闭管方法,它依赖于PCR扩增产物的热稳定性。不同仪器在热精度、样品形式、熔解速率、采集方式和软件方面存在差异。尚未对仪器的基因分型准确性进行评估。
在存在LCGreen Plus的情况下,采用4种PCR产物长度,通过PCR扩增CPS1(线粒体氨甲酰磷酸合成酶1)单核苷酸变异(SNV)(c.3405-29A>T)的每种基因型。在进行盲法处理和基因型随机化后,按照制造商推荐的条件,在10种仪器配置中对样品进行熔解。对于每种配置和PCR产物长度,我们使用商业软件和定制软件分析了32 - 96个样品(取决于批次大小)。我们评估了一个预测ΔT(m)为0.00°C的困难的、最近邻对称的4类变异体的杂合子检测准确性和纯合子区分准确性。
总体而言,杂合子准确性为99.7%(n = 2141),而纯合子准确性为70.3%(n = 4441)。与全板成像相比,采用单样品检测的仪器能更好地区分纯合子(分别为78.1%和61.8%,χ(2) P < 0.0005)。定制软件比商业软件提高了准确性(P < 0.002),尽管制造商推荐的熔解方案优于0.1°C恒定升温速率并覆盖油层的方案。51、100、272和547 bp的PCR产物的准确性分别为72.3%、83.1%、59.8%和65.9%(P < 0.0005)。
高分辨率熔解检测杂合子的准确性极佳,但纯合子准确性取决于检测模式、分析软件、PCR产物大小,以及纯合子之间的熔解温度差异和纯合子内部的变异。