Department of Sociology and Minnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota, 909 Social Sciences, 267 19th Avenue S., Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA,
Demography. 2014 Jun;51(3):1101-30. doi: 10.1007/s13524-014-0288-7.
More than one million people reported their race as American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) in the 2000 U.S. census but did not do so in the 1990 census. We ask three questions. First, which subgroups had the greatest numerical growth? Second, which subgroups had the greatest proportional increase? And third, are the 2000 single-race AIANs and the 1990 AIANs the same set of people? We use full-count and high-density decennial census data; adjust for birth, death, and immigration; decompose on age, gender, Latino origin, education, and birth state; and compare the observed subgroup sizes in 2000 with the sizes expected based on 1990 counts. The largest numerical increases were among adolescent and middle-aged non-Latinos, non-Latino women, and adults with no college degree. Latinos, women, highly educated adults, and people born in Eastern states had the largest proportionate gains. The ability to report multiple races in 2000 and the new federal definition of "American Indian" may have especially affected these groups, although personal-identity changes are probably also involved. We find that thousands of new Latino AIANs reported only one race in 2000, but many 1990 AIANs reported multiple races in 2000. Thus, the 1990 AIANs and 2000 single-race AIANs are not always the same individuals.
超过 100 万人在 2000 年美国人口普查中报告自己的种族为美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民 (AIAN),但在 1990 年人口普查中并未这样做。我们提出三个问题。首先,哪些亚组的数量增长最大?其次,哪些亚组的比例增长最大?第三,2000 年的单一种族 AIAN 和 1990 年的 AIAN 是否是同一批人?我们使用全计数和高密度十年一次的人口普查数据;调整出生、死亡和移民因素;按年龄、性别、拉丁裔起源、教育程度和出生地分解;并将 2000 年观察到的亚组规模与基于 1990 年计数的预期规模进行比较。数量增长最大的是青少年和中年非拉丁裔、非拉丁裔女性以及没有大学学历的成年人。拉丁裔、女性、受过高等教育的成年人和出生在东部各州的人比例增长最大。2000 年能够报告多种族和新的联邦“美洲印第安人”定义可能特别影响了这些群体,尽管个人身份变化可能也有影响。我们发现,数千名新的拉丁裔 AIAN 在 2000 年仅报告了一个种族,但许多 1990 年的 AIAN 在 2000 年报告了多种族。因此,1990 年的 AIAN 和 2000 年的单一种族 AIAN 并不总是同一批人。