Suppr超能文献

血小板减少症患者内镜干预的安全性。

Safety of endoscopic interventions in patients with thrombocytopenia.

作者信息

Krishna Somashekar G, Rao Bhavana B, Thirumurthi Selvi, Lee Jeffrey H, Ramireddy Srinivas, Guindani Michele, Ross William A

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Sep;80(3):425-34. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.023. Epub 2014 Apr 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The risk of endoscopic interventions in thrombocytopenia has received little attention in the medical literature.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the safety of endoscopic interventions including evaluation of GI bleeding (GIB) in patients with thrombocytopenia.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective study, tertiary oncology center.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION

Review of consecutive endoscopies with preprocedure platelet counts (PCs) of 75 × 10(3)/μL or lower.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Risk of bleeding with routine endoscopic interventions and transfusion requirement after evaluation of GIB.

RESULTS

A total of 617 (351 upper, 266 lower [90 colonoscopies]) endoscopies were performed in 395 patients. Forceps-biopsy specimens were obtained in 398 endoscopies (mean ± standard deviation [SD] PC: 38.21 ± 11.7 × 10(3)/μL) and 45 polypectomies were performed in 17 endoscopies (mean ± SD PC: 39.65 ± 8.53 × 10(3)/μL). The risk of bleeding was 1.5% (6 of 398 endoscopies) at the biopsy site and 4% (2 of 45 polypectomies) at the polypectomy site. Active GIB (mean ± SD PC: 32.85 ± 4.0 × 10(3)/μL) was observed in 68 (11% of 617) endoscopies and intervention (mean ± SD PC: 33.68 ± 4.6 × 10(3)/μL) was performed in 41 procedures. Together, angiodysplasias and ulcers were the most common etiology (51.2% of 41). Hemostasis was achieved in 39 (95.1% of 41) procedures. Comparison of blood transfusions ± 3 days of successful therapy showed a 52% reduction (P < .001). By multivariate analysis, a higher aggregate blood transfusion 3 days preceding endoscopy (odds ratio 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.50; P < .001) predicted endoscopic findings of active GIB.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design, single center.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest endoscopic experience reported in thrombocytopenic patients (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or lower), bleeding caused by standard forceps biopsy and polypectomy (≤10 mm) was minor and easily controlled. Endoscopic therapy for GIB is safe and significantly reduces the packed red blood cell requirement and should be considered in patients with thrombocytopenia in the setting of an appropriate transfusion strategy.

摘要

背景

血小板减少症患者接受内镜干预的风险在医学文献中很少受到关注。

目的

本研究旨在评估内镜干预的安全性,包括评估血小板减少症患者的胃肠道出血(GIB)情况。

设计与地点

回顾性研究,三级肿瘤中心。

患者与干预措施

回顾连续进行的内镜检查,这些患者术前血小板计数(PC)为75×10³/μL或更低。

主要观察指标

常规内镜干预后的出血风险以及评估GIB后的输血需求。

结果

395例患者共进行了617次内镜检查(351例上消化道,266例下消化道[90例结肠镜检查])。398次内镜检查获取了钳取活检标本(平均±标准差[SD]PC:38.21±11.7×10³/μL),17次内镜检查进行了45次息肉切除术(平均±SD PC:39.65±8.53×10³/μL)。活检部位出血风险为1.5%(398次内镜检查中有6次),息肉切除部位出血风险为4%(45次息肉切除术中2次)。68次内镜检查(617次中的11%)观察到活动性GIB(平均±SD PC:32.85±4.0×10³/μL),41例进行了干预(平均±SD PC:33.68±4.6×10³/μL)。血管发育异常和溃疡共同构成了最常见的病因(41例中的51.2%)。41例中有39例(95.1%)实现了止血。成功治疗±术后3天输血情况的比较显示减少了52%(P<.001)。多因素分析显示,内镜检查前3天较高的累计输血量(比值比1.32;95%置信区间,1.16 - 1.50;P<.001)可预测活动性GIB的内镜检查结果。

局限性

回顾性设计,单中心。

结论

在血小板减少症患者中报道的最大规模内镜检查经验(不良事件通用术语标准3级或更低)中,标准钳取活检和息肉切除术(≤10mm)引起的出血轻微且易于控制。内镜治疗GIB是安全的,显著降低了红细胞压积需求,在适当的输血策略下,血小板减少症患者应考虑采用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验