• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来那度胺(瑞复美®)、环磷酰胺(环磷酰胺®)和泼尼松(REP)治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者:单中心回顾性研究结果

Treatment with lenalidomide (Revlimid®), cyclophosphamide (Endoxan®) and prednisone (REP) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients: results of a single centre retrospective study.

作者信息

Zelis N, Devos T, Dierickx D, Janssens A, Raddoux J, Verhoef G, Delforge M

出版信息

Acta Clin Belg. 2014 Apr;69(2):98-103. doi: 10.1179/0001551214Z.00000000030. Epub 2014 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1179/0001551214Z.00000000030
PMID:24724748
Abstract

Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) combined with intermittent dexamethasone (the RD regimen) is one of the current standards for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, since the disease in the majority of patients will become resistant to RD, or treatment with RD needs to be discontinued due to side effects, we evaluated the combination lenalidomide, low-dose oral cyclophosphamide, with prednisone (REP) in patients with relapsed/refractory MM previously exposed to RD. For this purpose, we performed a single centre retrospective study of the efficacy of REP in 19 patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Overall response rate (partial response or better) with REP was 68% compared with 83% with RD, but with a shorter time to response with the triplet REP. Time to progression after REP was 6 months. Overall the REP regimen was better tolerated compared to RD. We conclude that the REP regimen is an effective treatment regimen for patients with relapsed/refractory MM with good tolerance, warranting further exploration in prospective randomized trials.

摘要

来那度胺(瑞复美®)联合间歇性地塞米松(RD方案)是目前复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的治疗标准方案之一。然而,由于大多数患者的疾病会对RD产生耐药性,或者因副作用需要停用RD治疗,我们评估了来那度胺、低剂量口服环磷酰胺与泼尼松联合(REP方案)用于既往接受过RD治疗的复发/难治性MM患者的疗效。为此,我们对19例复发/难治性MM患者进行了一项关于REP方案疗效的单中心回顾性研究。REP方案的总缓解率(部分缓解或更好)为68%,而RD方案为83%,但三联方案REP的缓解时间更短。REP方案后的疾病进展时间为6个月。总体而言,与RD方案相比,REP方案的耐受性更好。我们得出结论,REP方案是一种有效的治疗复发/难治性MM患者的方案,耐受性良好,值得在前瞻性随机试验中进一步探索。

相似文献

1
Treatment with lenalidomide (Revlimid®), cyclophosphamide (Endoxan®) and prednisone (REP) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients: results of a single centre retrospective study.来那度胺(瑞复美®)、环磷酰胺(环磷酰胺®)和泼尼松(REP)治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者:单中心回顾性研究结果
Acta Clin Belg. 2014 Apr;69(2):98-103. doi: 10.1179/0001551214Z.00000000030. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
2
Phase I-II trial of oral cyclophosphamide, prednisone and lenalidomide for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.口服环磷酰胺、泼尼松和来那度胺治疗复发难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的I-II期试验
Br J Haematol. 2015 Jan;168(1):46-54. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13100. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
3
Lenalidomide (Revlimid) combined with continuous oral cyclophosphamide (endoxan) and prednisone (REP) is effective in lenalidomide/dexamethasone-refractory myeloma.
Br J Haematol. 2010 Jan;148(2):335-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07931.x.
4
Phase 1/2 study of lenalidomide combined with low-dose cyclophosphamide and prednisone in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma.来那度胺难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者中应用来那度胺联合低剂量环磷酰胺和泼尼松的 1/2 期研究。
Blood. 2016 Nov 10;128(19):2297-2306. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-07-729236. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
5
Final report of toxicity and efficacy of a phase II study of oral cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and prednisone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: A Hoosier Oncology Group Trial, HEM01-21.口服环磷酰胺、沙利度胺和泼尼松治疗复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的II期研究的毒性和疗效最终报告:一项印第安纳肿瘤学集团试验,HEM01 - 21
Oncologist. 2007 Jan;12(1):99-106. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-1-99.
6
Lenalidomide in relapsed refractory myeloma patients: impact of previous response to bortezomib and thalidomide on treatment efficacy. Results of a medical need program in Belgium.来那度胺用于复发难治性骨髓瘤患者:既往对硼替佐米和沙利度胺的反应对治疗疗效的影响。比利时一项医疗需求项目的结果
Acta Clin Belg. 2011 Sep-Oct;66(5):371-5. doi: 10.2143/ACB.66.5.2062589.
7
Low-dose thalidomide in combination with oral weekly cyclophosphamide and pulsed dexamethasone is a well tolerated and effective regimen in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.低剂量沙利度胺联合口服每周一次环磷酰胺和脉冲式地塞米松,对于复发和难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者是一种耐受性良好且有效的治疗方案。
Br J Haematol. 2005 Jun;129(6):763-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05521.x.
8
The combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone reduces bone resorption in responding patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma but has no effect on bone formation: final results on 205 patients of the Greek myeloma study group.来那度胺联合地塞米松可减少复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤应答患者的骨质吸收,但对骨质形成无影响:希腊骨髓瘤研究组 205 例患者的最终结果。
Am J Hematol. 2014 Jan;89(1):34-40. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23577.
9
Management of the relapsed/refractory myeloma patient: strategies incorporating lenalidomide.复发/难治性骨髓瘤患者的管理:包含来那度胺的策略
Semin Hematol. 2005 Oct;42(4 Suppl 4):S9-15. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2005.10.004.
10
"Real-world" data on the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who were treated according to the standard clinical practice: a study of the Greek Myeloma Study Group.根据标准临床实践治疗的复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者来那度胺和地塞米松疗效和安全性的“真实世界”数据:希腊骨髓瘤研究小组的研究。
Ann Hematol. 2014 Jan;93(1):129-39. doi: 10.1007/s00277-013-1841-y. Epub 2013 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Lenalidomide in Multiple Myeloma: Review of Resistance Mechanisms, Current Treatment Strategies and Future Perspectives.来那度胺治疗多发性骨髓瘤:耐药机制、当前治疗策略及未来展望综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 2;15(3):963. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030963.
2
The clinical management of lenalidomide-based therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者基于来那度胺的治疗的临床管理。
Ann Hematol. 2020 Aug;99(8):1709-1725. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04023-4. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
3
Using pharmacy management systems for research: survival outcomes for lenalidomide in multiple myeloma in the clinical setting.
利用药房管理系统进行研究:来那度胺在临床环境中治疗多发性骨髓瘤的生存结果
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Aug;39(4):836-843. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0480-0. Epub 2017 Jun 1.