Ozaltin Fatih, Bilginer Yelda, Gülhan Bora, Bajin Inci, Erdogan Ozlem, Hayran Mutlu, Yılmaz Engin, Ozen Seza
Departments of Pediatric Nephrology and Rheumatology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, 06100, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey,
Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Jul;33(7):969-74. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2598-y. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
Although response to colchicine has been proposed as one of the diagnostic criteria in patients with Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), the validity of this response has not been validated. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of the response to colchicine and to evaluate the extent of the effect of placebo. A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial with a cross-over design was conducted. The frequency of FMF attacks, the disease score, physical examination, and acute phase reactants were assessed at 0, 3, and 6 months. Blood samples were collected for complete blood count (CBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), levels of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA), and MEFV mutation analysis in 79 patients with a preliminary diagnosis of FMF. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either drug A or drug B in a double-blind fashion. The designated drug was switched at 3 months. Patients taking colchicine had less frequent FMF attacks (median 0) and lower FMF disease score (median 0) when compared to those on placebo (median 1 and 3, respectively) (p = 0.002 and p = 0.007, respectively). In genetically confirmed FMF patients, median attack number and median disease score was 0 under colchicine treatment, whereas these parameters were significantly higher in the placebo group (median 2 and 8, respectively) (p = 0.007 and p = 0.02, respectively) suggesting that colchicine is more effective than placebo in reducing attacks and disease score. Positive and negative predictive values were 70.2 and 37.5 %, respectively. During the placebo period, patients had less FMF attacks when compared to that of the pre-study period (median 2 vs 6, respectively) (p < 0.001). The high false positive rate raises concerns for considering the colchicine response test as diagnostic for FMF. The role of placebo on the attacks of periodic fever syndromes needs to be further investigated.
尽管对秋水仙碱的反应已被提议作为家族性地中海热(FMF)患者的诊断标准之一,但这种反应的有效性尚未得到验证。本研究的目的是评估对秋水仙碱反应的疗效,并评估安慰剂的作用程度。进行了一项采用交叉设计的双盲随机安慰剂对照试验。在0、3和6个月时评估FMF发作频率、疾病评分、体格检查和急性期反应物。收集79例初步诊断为FMF患者的血液样本进行全血细胞计数(CBC)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、血清C反应蛋白(CRP)和血清淀粉样蛋白A(SAA)水平检测以及MEFV突变分析。患者以双盲方式随机分配接受药物A或药物B。指定药物在3个月时更换。与服用安慰剂的患者相比(分别为中位数1和3),服用秋水仙碱的患者FMF发作频率更低(中位数0),FMF疾病评分更低(中位数0)(分别为p = 0.002和p = 0.007)。在基因确诊的FMF患者中,秋水仙碱治疗下发作次数中位数和疾病评分中位数为0,而安慰剂组这些参数显著更高(分别为中位数2和8)(分别为p = 0.007和p = 0.02),表明秋水仙碱在减少发作和疾病评分方面比安慰剂更有效。阳性和阴性预测值分别为70.2%和37.5%。在安慰剂期,与研究前相比,患者的FMF发作次数更少(分别为中位数2和6)(p < 0.001)。高假阳性率引发了对将秋水仙碱反应试验作为FMF诊断方法予以考虑的担忧。安慰剂在周期性发热综合征发作中的作用需要进一步研究。