Mintalucci Dominic, Lutsky Kevin F, Matzon Jonas L, Rivlin Michael, Niver Genghis, Beredjiklian Pedro K
Department of Orthopaedics, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA; Division of Hand Surgery, Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA.
Department of Orthopaedics, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA; Division of Hand Surgery, Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA.
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Jun;39(6):1068-74.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
To determine the radiographic dimensions of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint and to compare these measurements with commonly used headless compression screws.
Using standard posteroanterior and lateral radiographs of the hand, we measured the dimensions of the distal and middle phalanges in 60 index, middle, ring, and little fingers. We then compared these measurements with the diameters and lengths of 16 commercially available headless compression screws commonly used to perform DIP joint arthrodesis. Percent compatibility and risk factors for incompatibility were determined.
In general, commercially available screw diameters were too large given the anatomic dimensions of the DIP joint. The distal phalanx shaft as measured on the lateral view was the narrowest determinant of fit. When the dimensions of all fixation devices were combined, screws were oversized relative to the bony anatomy in 66% of index fingers, 53% of middle fingers, 49% of ring fingers, and 72% of little fingers. This mismatch was greater in women than in men. Only 1 of the compression screw types demonstrated a compatibility rate greater than 90% for the index and little fingers, respectively. A multivariate analysis of independent risk factors showed the likelihood of a compatible fit to vary directly with patient height and to be less likely in the little and index fingers. Interobserver reliability analysis revealed excellent x-ray measurement correlation between observers.
A size mismatch existed between the anatomic dimensions of the DIP joint and commercially available headless compression screws. Caution must be used when considering these screws for DIP joint arthrodesis, to avoid problems related to screw prominence in the narrow aspects of the distal and middle phalanges.
Headless compression screws are frequently oversized for use in DIP arthrodesis.
确定远侧指间关节(DIP)的影像学尺寸,并将这些测量值与常用的无头加压螺钉进行比较。
利用手部标准正位和侧位X线片,我们测量了60根示指、中指、环指和小指中远节指骨和中节指骨的尺寸。然后,我们将这些测量值与16种常用于DIP关节融合术的市售无头加压螺钉的直径和长度进行比较。确定了兼容性百分比和不兼容的风险因素。
总体而言,考虑到DIP关节的解剖尺寸,市售螺钉直径过大。侧位片上测量的远节指骨干是适配的最窄决定因素。当所有固定装置的尺寸综合考虑时,66%的示指、53%的中指、49%的环指和72%的小指中,螺钉相对于骨骼解剖结构尺寸过大。女性的这种不匹配比男性更严重。只有一种加压螺钉类型分别对示指和小指的兼容性率大于90%。独立风险因素的多变量分析显示,适配的可能性与患者身高直接相关,在小指和示指中可能性较小。观察者间可靠性分析显示观察者之间的X线测量相关性极佳。
DIP关节的解剖尺寸与市售无头加压螺钉之间存在尺寸不匹配。在考虑将这些螺钉用于DIP关节融合术时必须谨慎,以避免与远节和中节指骨狭窄部位的螺钉突出相关的问题。
无头加压螺钉在用于DIP关节融合术时经常尺寸过大。