Suppr超能文献

认知方式:实在论、非实在论、唯名论以及从护理科学的反视角对一种类型学的重新审视。

Ways of knowing: realism, non-realism, nominalism and a typology revisited with a counter perspective for nursing science.

作者信息

Garrett Bernard M, Cutting Roger L

机构信息

University of British Columbia, School of Nursing, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Institute of Education, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK.

出版信息

Nurs Inq. 2015 Jun;22(2):95-105. doi: 10.1111/nin.12070. Epub 2014 Apr 25.

Abstract

In this paper, we reconsider the context of Barbara Carper's alternative ways of knowing, a prominent discourse in modern nursing theory in North America. We explore this relative to the concepts of realism, non-realism and nominalism, and investigate the philosophical divisions behind the original typology, particularly in relationship to modern scientific enquiry. We examine forms of knowledge relative to realist and nominalist positions and make an argument ad absurdum against relativistic interpretations of knowledge using the example of Borge's Chinese Emporium of Benevolent Knowledge. We propose a contentious postpositivist practical classification for nursing knowledge that demonstrates and supports the idea that knowledge has both individual and subjective components. This classification supports the practical application of nursing knowledge within the paradigm of realist postpositivist science.

摘要

在本文中,我们重新审视了芭芭拉·卡珀的多元认知方式这一背景,它是北美现代护理理论中的一个重要论述。我们结合实在论、非实在论和唯名论的概念来探讨这一论述,并研究原始类型学背后的哲学分歧,尤其是与现代科学探究的关系。我们考察相对于实在论和唯名论立场的知识形式,并以博尔赫斯的《仁慈知识中华商店》为例,对知识的相对主义解释进行归谬论证。我们为护理知识提出了一个有争议的后实证主义实践分类,该分类展示并支持了知识具有个体和主观成分这一观点。这一分类支持了护理知识在实在论后实证主义科学范式内的实际应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验