Suppr超能文献

在毒品政策背景下,什么是善治?

What is good governance in the context of drug policy?

作者信息

Singleton Nicola, Rubin Jennifer

机构信息

UK Drug Policy Commission, Kings Place, 90 York Way, London N1 9AG, United Kingdom.

RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 1YG, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2014 Sep;25(5):935-41. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.03.008. Epub 2014 Mar 30.

Abstract

The concept of governance is applied in a wide range of contexts, but this paper focuses on governance in relation to public administration, i.e. states and how they take action, and specifically governance of particular policy areas. In the current context of financial austerity and an era of globalisation, policy-makers face pressures and challenges from a growing range of interests and local, national and supranational actors. Drug policy is an example of a particularly contentious and polarised area in which governance-related challenges abound. In response to these challenges, interest has grown in developing agreed policy governance standards and processes and articulating policy-making guidelines, including the use of available evidence to inform policy-making. Attempts have been made to identify 'policy fundamentals' - factors or aspects of policy-making apparently associated with successful policy development and implementation (Hallsworth & Rutter, 2011; Laughrin, 2011) and, in the drug policy field, Hughes et al. (2010) reflecting on the co-ordination of Australian drug policy highlighted some of what they considered principles of good governance. But how useful is the concept of 'good governance'; how well can it be defined, and to what purpose? As part of a wider project considering the governance of drug policy, RAND Europe and the UK Drug Policy Commission undertook a targeted review of other research and sought expert views, from within and beyond drug policy, on principles, processes, structures and stakeholders associated with good drug policy governance. From this emerged some perceived characteristics of good governance that were then used by the UK Drug Policy Commission to assess the extent to which drug policy making in the UK fits with these perceived good governance characteristics, and to suggest possible improvements. Particular consideration was given to the range of interests at stake, the overarching aims of drug policy and the development and inclusion of an evidence base where possible. This paper draws on findings of the study to highlight challenges associated with defining good governance, provides an example of a framework for assessing drug policy governance and discusses the feasibility, transferability and potential benefits of such an undertaking.

摘要

治理的概念在广泛的背景中得到应用,但本文聚焦于与公共行政相关的治理,即国家以及它们如何采取行动,特别是特定政策领域的治理。在当前财政紧缩和全球化时代的背景下,政策制定者面临着来自越来越多的利益相关方以及地方、国家和超国家行为体的压力和挑战。毒品政策就是一个特别有争议且两极分化的领域的例子,其中存在大量与治理相关的挑战。为应对这些挑战,人们越来越关注制定商定的政策治理标准和流程,并阐明政策制定指南,包括利用现有证据为政策制定提供信息。人们试图确定“政策基本面”——政策制定中明显与成功的政策制定和实施相关的因素或方面(霍尔沃思和拉特尔,2011年;劳克林,2011年),在毒品政策领域,休斯等人(2010年)在反思澳大利亚毒品政策的协调时,强调了一些他们认为的善治原则。但是,“善治”概念有多有用?它能被多好地定义,以及用于什么目的?作为一个更广泛的考虑毒品政策治理项目的一部分,兰德欧洲公司和英国毒品政策委员会对其他研究进行了有针对性的审查,并征求了毒品政策内外专家对与良好毒品政策治理相关的原则、流程、结构和利益相关者的看法。由此浮现出一些善治的感知特征,英国毒品政策委员会随后利用这些特征来评估英国毒品政策制定在多大程度上符合这些感知到的善治特征,并提出可能的改进建议。特别考虑了利害攸关的利益范围、毒品政策的总体目标以及尽可能建立证据基础并将其纳入。本文借鉴该研究的结果,强调与定义善治相关的挑战,提供一个评估毒品政策治理的框架示例,并讨论这样一项工作的可行性、可转移性和潜在益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验