Physical Therapy Program, Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Aug;95(8):1454-60. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
To determine the feasibility and impact of different dosages of Intensive Mobility Training (IMT) on mobility, balance, and gait speed in individuals with chronic traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Prospective, single group design with 3-month follow-up.
University research laboratory.
Volunteer sample of participants with chronic TBI (N=10; ≥3 mo post-TBI; able to ambulate 3.05 m with or without assistance; median age, 35.4 y; interquartile range, 23.5-46 y; median time post-TBI, 9.91 y; interquartile range, 6.3-14.2 y). Follow-up data were collected for all participants.
Twenty days (5 d/wk for 4 wk), with 150 min/d of repetitive, task-specific training equally divided among balance; gait training; and strength, coordination, and range.
Pain and fatigue were recorded before and after each session to assess feasibility. Treatment outcomes were assessed before training (pre), after 10 sessions (interim), after 20 sessions (post), and at 3-months follow-up and included the Berg Balance Scale and gait speed.
Participants averaged 150.1±2.7 minutes per session. Median presession and postsession pain scores were 0 (out of 10) for 20 sessions; median presession fatigue scores ranged from 0 to 2.5 (out of 10); and postsession scores ranged from 3 to 5.5 (out of 10). Four outcome measures demonstrated significant improvement from the pretest to interim, with 7 out of 10 participants exceeding the minimal detectable change (MDC) for fast walking speed. At the posttest, 2 additional measures were significant, with more participants exceeding the MDCs. Changes in fast walking speed and Timed Up and Go test were significant at follow-up.
Limited fluctuations in pain and fatigue scores indicate feasibility of IMT in this population. Participants demonstrated improvements in walking speed, mobility, and balance postintervention and maintained gains in fast walking speed and mobility at 3 months.
确定强化移动训练(IMT)的不同剂量对慢性创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的移动能力、平衡和步速的可行性和影响。
前瞻性、单组设计,随访 3 个月。
大学研究实验室。
慢性 TBI 志愿者样本(N=10;TBI 后≥3 个月;能够在有或没有帮助的情况下行走 3.05 米;中位数年龄 35.4 岁;四分位距 23.5-46 岁;TBI 后中位数时间 9.91 岁;四分位距 6.3-14.2 岁)。所有参与者均收集了随访数据。
20 天(每周 5 天,持续 4 周),每天进行 150 分钟重复、特定任务的训练,平衡、步态训练以及力量、协调和范围各占三分之一。
每次治疗前后记录疼痛和疲劳情况以评估可行性。治疗结果在训练前(pre)、10 次治疗后(interim)、20 次治疗后(post)和 3 个月随访时进行评估,包括 Berg 平衡量表和步态速度。
参与者平均每次治疗 150.1±2.7 分钟。20 次治疗中,中位数治疗前和治疗后疼痛评分均为 0(满分 10 分);中位数治疗前疲劳评分范围为 0-2.5(满分 10 分);治疗后评分范围为 3-5.5(满分 10 分)。4 项结果测量指标从预测试到中间测试均显著改善,7 名参与者中有 10 名超过快速步行速度的最小可检测变化(MDC)。在测试后,另外 2 项测量指标也有显著变化,更多参与者超过了 MDC。快速步行速度和计时起立行走测试的变化在随访时仍具有统计学意义。
疼痛和疲劳评分的波动有限,表明该人群中 IMT 的可行性。参与者在干预后表现出步行速度、移动能力和平衡能力的改善,并在 3 个月时保持了快速步行速度和移动能力的提高。