Suppr超能文献

普乐沙福用于挽救性干细胞动员可减少多发性骨髓瘤患者白细胞分离术的使用。

Rescue stem cell mobilization with plerixafor economizes leukapheresis in patients with multiple myeloma.

作者信息

Hundemer Michael, Engelhardt Melanie, Bruckner Thomas, Kraeker Sandra, Schmitt Anita, Sauer Sandra, Neben Kai, Witzens-Harig Mathias, Goldschmidt Hartmut, Ho Anthony D, Wuchter Patrick

机构信息

Department of Medicine V, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Apher. 2014 Dec;29(6):299-304. doi: 10.1002/jca.21323. Epub 2014 Apr 26.

Abstract

While extensive data demonstrated that plerixafor improves stem cell harvest in difficult-to-mobilize patients, economic concerns limit a broader application. We retrospectively assessed the effect of an early plerixafor rescue regimen for mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma. Patients were intended for high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT) and therefore received cyclophosphamide-based mobilization chemotherapy and consecutive stimulation with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Fifteen patients with poor stem cell harvest in the first leukapheresis session received plerixafor. Data were compared with a matched historic control group of 45 patients who also had a poor stem cell yield in the first apheresis session, but continued mobilization with G-CSF alone. Patients in the plerixafor group collected significantly more CD34+ cells in total (median 4.9 vs. 3.7 [range 1.6-14.1 vs. 1.1-8.0] × 10(6) CD34+ cells /kg bw; P < 0.05), and also more CD34+ cells per leukapheresis procedure (P < 0.001). Consequently, they required a significantly lower number of leukapheresis procedures to achieve the collection goal (median 2.0 vs. 4.0 [range 2-3 vs. 2-9] procedures; P < 0.001). The efficiency of the collected stem cells in terms of hematologic engraftment after ABSCT was found to be equal in both groups. These data demonstrate that rescue mobilization with plerixafor triggered by a low stem cell yield in the first leukapheresis session is effective. Although the actual economic benefit may vary depending on the local leukapheresis costs, the median saving of two leukapheresis procedures offsets most of the expenses for the substance in this setting. An exemplary cost calculation is provided to illustrate this effect.

摘要

尽管大量数据表明普乐沙福可改善难以动员的患者的干细胞采集情况,但经济因素限制了其更广泛的应用。我们回顾性评估了早期普乐沙福挽救方案对多发性骨髓瘤患者动员的效果。患者计划接受大剂量化疗,随后进行自体外周血干细胞移植(ABSCT),因此接受了基于环磷酰胺的动员化疗,并连续使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)进行刺激。15例在首次白细胞分离术中干细胞采集不佳的患者接受了普乐沙福治疗。将数据与一个匹配的历史对照组进行比较,该对照组有45例患者,他们在首次单采术中干细胞产量也不佳,但仅继续使用G-CSF进行动员。普乐沙福组患者总共采集的CD34+细胞明显更多(中位数分别为4.9与3.7 [范围1.6 - 14.1与1.1 - 8.0]×10⁶个CD34+细胞/kg体重;P < 0.05),并且每次白细胞分离术采集的CD34+细胞也更多(P < 0.001)。因此,他们达到采集目标所需的白细胞分离术次数明显更少(中位数分别为2.0与4.0 [范围2 - 3与2 - 9]次;P < 0.001)。发现两组在ABSCT后造血植入方面所采集干细胞的效率相当。这些数据表明,在首次白细胞分离术中因干细胞产量低而触发的普乐沙福挽救性动员是有效的。尽管实际经济效益可能因当地白细胞分离术成本而异,但两次白细胞分离术的中位数节省抵消了在这种情况下该药物的大部分费用。提供了一个示例性成本计算来说明这种效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验