Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405.
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Apr;37(2):193-4. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13002215.
Three challenges to the sufficiency of the associative account for explaining the development of mirror mechanisms are discussed: Genetic predispositions interact with associative learning, infants show predispositions to imitate human as opposed to nonhuman actions, and early and later learning involve different mechanisms. Legitimate objections to an extreme nativist account are raised, but the proposed solution is equally problematic.
遗传倾向与联想学习相互作用,婴儿表现出模仿人类而不是非人类行为的倾向,以及早期和后期学习涉及不同的机制。对极端先天论解释提出了合理的反对意见,但提出的解决方案同样存在问题。