Medicine Learning and Teaching Unit, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, Lyell McEwin Health Service, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Elizabeth Vale, South Australia, Australia Northern Adelaide Palliative Care Service, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Modbury, South Australia, Australia.
Discipline of Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia Central Adelaide Palliative Care Service, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Woodville, South Australia, Australia.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2016 Jun;6(2):178-85. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000626. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
Medical practitioners have different causal explanations for depression, and may have greater difficulty in explaining causality of depression in the palliative care setting. The objective of this study was to investigate and describe the causal explanations of depression in the palliative care setting, from the perspective of palliative medicine specialists.
Palliative medicine specialists practising in Australia were recruited and purposively sampled. Individual semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted to explore their explanatory models of depression, including a focus on causal explanations. Nine participants were interviewed to reach data saturation. Interview transcripts were analysed for themes.
Six themes for causal explanations of depression were identified: (1) Depression is inexplicable; (2) Biological explanations-primarily neurotransmitter depletion; (3) Psychological explanations-including reaction to circumstances, inability to accept illness and dying, diminished self, and coping mechanisms; (4) Social explanations-including inadequate social support, and contribution from modern medicine and societal norms; (5) Interrelationships between causal factors-mainly multifactoriality; (6) Different explanation for de novo and pre-existing depressions. Participants also articulated a link between causal explanations and clinical interventions.
Palliative medicine specialists hold causal explanations of depression that align with the biopsychosocial and vulnerability-stress models. They use multiple individual explanations with diverse theoretical underpinnings, and largely view depression as multifactorial in causality. Given that causal explanations are linked to clinical interventions, these findings have implications for clinical practice and medical education.
医疗从业者对抑郁症有不同的因果解释,在姑息治疗环境中,他们可能更难以解释抑郁症的因果关系。本研究的目的是从姑息医学专家的角度调查和描述姑息治疗环境中抑郁症的因果解释。
招募了在澳大利亚执业的姑息医学专家,并进行了有针对性的抽样。进行了个体半结构化深入访谈,以探讨他们对抑郁症的解释模型,包括对因果关系的重点关注。采访了 9 名参与者,以达到数据饱和。对访谈记录进行了主题分析。
确定了抑郁症因果解释的 6 个主题:(1)抑郁症是无法解释的;(2)生物学解释——主要是神经递质耗竭;(3)心理学解释——包括对环境、无法接受疾病和死亡、自我减弱以及应对机制的反应;(4)社会解释——包括社会支持不足,以及现代医学和社会规范的贡献;(5)因果因素之间的相互关系——主要是多因素性;(6)新发和预先存在的抑郁症的不同解释。参与者还阐述了因果解释与临床干预之间的联系。
姑息医学专家对抑郁症的因果解释与生物心理社会和脆弱性-应激模型一致。他们使用具有不同理论基础的多种个体解释,并且在很大程度上认为抑郁症的因果关系是多因素的。鉴于因果解释与临床干预有关,这些发现对临床实践和医学教育具有影响。