Poulier Gaëlle, Lissalde Sophie, Charriau Adeline, Buzier Rémy, Cleries Karine, Delmas François, Mazzella Nicolas, Guibaud Gilles
Unité de recherche REBX, Groupement Irstea de Bordeaux, 50 Avenue de Verdun, Gazinet, 33612, Cestas CEDEX, Cestas, France,
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Jun;22(11):8044-57. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-2814-y. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
In this study, the passive sampling strategy was evaluated for its ability to improve water quality monitoring in terms of concentrations and frequencies of quantification of pesticides, with a focus on flux calculation. Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Samplers (POCIS) were successively exposed and renewed at three sampling sites of an extensive French multi-agricultural watershed from January to September 2012. Grab water samples were recovered every 14 days during the same period and an automated sampler collected composite water samples from April to July 2012. Thirty-nine compounds (pesticides and metabolites) were analysed. DEA, diuron and atrazine (banned in France for many years) likely arrived via groundwater whereas dimethanamid, imidacloprid and acetochlor (all still in use) were probably transported via leaching. The comparison of the three sampling strategies showed that the POCIS offers lower detection limits, resulting in the quantification of trace levels of compounds (acetochlor, diuron and desethylatrazine (DEA)) that could not be measured in grab and composite water samples. As a consequence, the frequencies of occurrence were dramatically enhanced with the POCIS compared to spot sample data. Moreover, the integration of flood events led to a better temporal representation of the fluxes when calculated with the POCIS compared to the bimonthly grab sampling strategy. We conclude that the POCIS could be an advantageous alternative to spot sampling, offering better performance in terms of quantification limits and more representative data.
在本研究中,对被动采样策略在改善农药浓度和定量频率方面的水质监测能力进行了评估,重点是通量计算。2012年1月至9月期间,极地有机化学综合采样器(POCIS)在法国一个广阔的多农业流域的三个采样点连续暴露并更新。同期每14天采集一次瞬时水样,2012年4月至7月用自动采样器采集混合水样。分析了39种化合物(农药和代谢物)。敌草胺、敌草隆和莠去津(在法国已被禁用多年)可能是通过地下水到达的,而二甲草胺、吡虫啉和乙草胺(均仍在使用)可能是通过淋溶运输的。三种采样策略的比较表明,POCIS的检测限更低,能够对瞬时水样和混合水样中无法测量的痕量化合物(乙草胺、敌草隆和去乙基莠去津(DEA))进行定量。因此,与瞬时采样数据相比,POCIS的检出频率显著提高。此外,与每两个月采集一次瞬时水样的采样策略相比,在计算通量时,考虑洪水事件后,POCIS能更好地反映通量的时间变化。我们得出结论,POCIS可能是瞬时采样的一个有利替代方法,在定量限和数据代表性方面具有更好的性能。